The US Air Force and Army are increasingly focused on integrating private industry access to military test ranges and infrastructure. This push is driven by the need to accelerate the development cycle of advanced defense technologies and improve the efficiency of testing complex systems. Strategically, this mandates that the Department of Defense (DoD) reform its traditional acquisition processes to establish robust frameworks for commercial-military collaboration. The implication is a shift toward a more public-private partnership model, which could streamline testing, reduce costs, and significantly speed up the fielding of next-generation military capabilities.
Mitchell
This hub page collects curated ThinkTankWeekly entries for Mitchell and links readers back to the publisher for the original reports.
-
1.
-
2.
The article analyzes the strategic dilemma facing the U.S. regarding the Houthis: whether to pursue military strikes or adopt a policy of restraint. The core reasoning suggests that while military action offers immediate deterrence, the risk of severe regional escalation—particularly involving Iran or neighboring states—is prohibitively high. Therefore, the policy implication is that a successful strategy must prioritize a calibrated blend of diplomatic pressure and limited, highly targeted engagements. This approach aims to degrade Houthi capabilities and maintain stability without triggering a wider Middle East conflict.
-
3.
The article argues that geopolitical or military power derived solely from sheer scale or accumulation of assets ("Mass") is inherently temporary and unsustainable. True, enduring power requires 'Depth,' which refers to underlying institutional resilience, technological superiority, and strategic coherence. The analysis suggests that nations or powers that focus only on quantitative buildup—such as excessive military spending or population size—will eventually falter without deep structural reforms or advanced capabilities. Policymakers must therefore shift strategic focus from mere accumulation to fostering systemic depth, emphasizing technological innovation and robust institutional frameworks to maintain long-term influence.
-
4.
The article details the systematic preparation and infrastructure development required for the F-47's flight testing, signaling a major advancement in next-generation air superiority capabilities. Key groundwork involves establishing specialized testing protocols and integrating advanced systems, which suggests the program is progressing through critical, multi-stage development phases. Strategically, the successful testing and deployment of the F-47 will represent a significant leap in U.S. air power, necessitating that allies and rivals adjust their defense planning and force structure doctrines accordingly.
-
5.Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence in Military Operations: The Imperative of Human Judgment (Mitchell)
While Machine Learning and AI offer unprecedented opportunities to enhance military effectiveness and situational awareness, the paper argues that the risks associated with fully autonomous decision-making are significant. Human judgment remains critical because it is necessary for interpreting complex context, applying ethical principles, and maintaining strategic accountability. Therefore, the policy imperative is not to eliminate AI, but to develop strategies that aggressively exploit AI's military advantages while mandating human oversight in all high-consequence operational decisions.
-
6.
The article analyzes the operational significance of advanced propulsion systems, specifically referencing the Merlin motor, to assess modern missile capabilities. It likely argues that the integration of such high-performance rocket technology significantly enhances the range, payload, and strategic reach of military assets. Key reasoning centers on how these advancements allow for rapid deployment and increased operational flexibility across diverse theaters. Strategically, this implies that military planners must update their defense doctrines and investment priorities to account for these rapidly evolving, high-mobility strike capabilities.
-
7.
The analysis argues that Ukraine faces a critical 'F-16 emergency' due to the severe gap between its current air defense capabilities and the requirements of the ongoing conflict. Key evidence suggests that sustained Russian air operations and the need to protect critical infrastructure necessitate a rapid, large-scale infusion of advanced Western fighter jets. Strategically, this implies that Western allies must urgently accelerate the delivery of F-16s, along with necessary training and spare parts, to prevent a catastrophic decline in Ukrainian air power and maintain operational parity on the front lines.
-
8.
The article argues that realizing the strategic potential of 'CCA' requires moving beyond theoretical planning and establishing concrete, operational capabilities. Key reasoning highlights that successful implementation depends on the rapid integration of advanced technologies—such as AI and networked systems—and overcoming current acquisition bottlenecks. For policy, this necessitates a strategic pivot: shifting resources from pure research and development toward scalable, integrated deployment across existing military platforms. Policymakers must therefore prioritize joint service cooperation and streamlined acquisition processes to ensure the capability can transition effectively from concept to operational reality.
-
9.
The AF 2026 conference emphasized the critical need for integrated operational concepts across the air, space, and cyber domains to maintain military superiority. Key discussions highlighted the rapid integration of advanced technologies, including AI-driven command and control systems and resilient space architecture, as essential evidence for future force projection. Strategically, this necessitates a policy shift toward joint force doctrine that treats these domains as inseparable, requiring significant investment in modernization and securing critical national infrastructure against increasingly sophisticated threats.
-
10.
A USAF General suggests that the production of the F-47 fighter jet is rapidly approaching full capability. The core argument posits that significant technological and program maturation has minimized the historical gap between design and operational deployment. This assessment suggests that the U.S. Air Force is poised to integrate a next-generation platform into its fleet sooner than previously anticipated. Strategically, this implies a potential shift in air superiority doctrine and could accelerate the timeline for modernizing key components of American military power.
-
11.
The article posits that the U.S. Air Force is actively testing its Combat Capability Augmentation Systems (CCAs) to ensure readiness against modern, complex threats. The reasoning centers on the necessity of validating these advanced systems in real-world operational environments, moving beyond theoretical models to prove field efficacy. Successful testing of the CCAs is critical, as it dictates the future operational tempo and reach of U.S. airpower. Policymakers must therefore prioritize rapid integration and funding for these validated capabilities to maintain strategic superiority and deter potential adversaries.
-
12.War at the Speed of Information: Data Transport, Decision Advantage, & the Future of Military Space Communications (Mitchell)
The article argues that existing space communication architectures are fundamentally inadequate for the data volumes and speed required by modern, contested warfare. As military sensors and autonomous systems generate unprecedented data, adversaries can exploit these limitations through electronic warfare, creating critical operational vulnerabilities. To maintain decision advantage, the U.S. must move beyond incremental upgrades by adopting a hybrid RF-optical architecture. This strategy must be coupled with intelligent onboard processing, AI, and data compression to reduce transmission burdens and enhance network resilience.
-
13.
The article argues that the United States has confirmed the development and deployment of advanced space weapons systems, significantly escalating the militarization of orbital domains. Key evidence centers on the maturation of anti-satellite technologies and the integration of kinetic kill vehicles into national defense strategies. This development signals a shift toward a more contested space environment, necessitating urgent policy responses. Strategically, this mandates that nations reassess space security doctrines, potentially leading to new international arms control agreements or a significant increase in dedicated space defense spending.
-
14.
The Chief of the Royal Norwegian Air Force met with the Mitchell Institute to discuss modernizing Norwegian air capabilities and the implications of the war in Ukraine. Discussions highlighted the critical need for enhanced readiness, munitions capacity, and base defense across NATO allies. Both parties emphasized that the relationship between the U.S., Norway, and the NATO alliance is paramount for deterring future conflict and protecting their respective homelands. Strategically, the meeting underscores Norway's commitment to addressing multi-theater conflict potential and investing in long-term airpower sustainment and interoperability with U.S. forces.
-
15.
The publication argues that America's security posture must evolve significantly beyond the counter-terrorism focus established after 9/11. It posits that current threats are characterized by sophisticated great power competition, technological warfare, and systemic vulnerabilities, rather than solely relying on traditional military conflict. Key reasoning highlights the need to address emerging challenges in the cyber domain, space security, and the strategic rivalry with peer competitors. Policy implications stress the necessity of a comprehensive national resilience strategy that integrates diplomatic, economic, and technological defenses to safeguard national interests in the coming decades.
-
16.Commercial Space Is Not an Endless Field of Innovation: An Assessment of the Good, the Bad, & the Ugly (Mitchell)
The Mitchell Institute argues that while commercial space promises faster and cheaper options for U.S. national security, it should not be treated as an endless field of innovation. The assessment balances the benefits of private investment and expanded capacity against significant risks, including scaling challenges, high startup failure rates, and policy barriers. For commercial integration to successfully strengthen a hybrid space architecture, the report emphasizes that government acquisition must adopt a deliberate, strategic approach. Policy recommendations stress the need for stable funding, realistic requirements, rigorous testing, and robust collaborative relationships between government and industry.
-
17.Launch Is an Event, Sustainment Is the Campaign: Building an On-Orbit Sustainment Ecosystem (Mitchell)
The article argues that while launching replacement satellites is sufficient for some missions, on-orbit sustainment capabilities are critical for protecting high-value, fuel-limited GEO assets during conflict. Current technologies needed for orbital servicing exist but lack integration and scaling into a dependable logistics network required by the U.S. Space Force. To overcome this gap, the report urges deliberate government action to make future national security spacecraft service-ready and develop interoperable standards with allies and industry partners. Ultimately, establishing a pathway for mature commercial logistics services will allow the U.S. military to access assured orbital capacity during a crisis without having to build an entirely separate government fleet.
-
18.Shared Understanding, Distributed Judgment: USAF Command and Control in Complex Operations (Mitchell)
The article argues that traditional USAF command and control (C2) systems are vulnerable to modern adversaries who target the U.S.'s information and decision-making processes. To maintain effectiveness in contested environments, C2 must adopt a model of tightly coupled shared awareness while loosely coupling decisional authority by distributing judgment to subordinate commanders. This approach requires treating organizational coupling as a deliberate design variable, pre-delegating authority, and simplifying plans. Strategically, this emphasizes that successful modern operations depend on decentralizing decision-making power while ensuring all units maintain a unified understanding of the operational picture.
-
19.
The paper argues that current defense resource allocation fails because it relies on platform-level acquisition metrics rather than assessing actual combat effectiveness. To improve force design, the Department of Defense must shift its focus from individual platform costs to a Cost-Per-Effect (CPE) methodology, which measures investment value based on achieved campaign outcomes. However, implementing this requires developing a standardized comparative cost framework and tiered modeling architecture that the Pentagon currently lacks. Institutionalizing CPE will allow senior leaders to consistently evaluate complex investment trade-offs, better guide force planning, and ensure resource decisions are tightly aligned with national defense strategy.
-
20.
The paper argues that countering China’s anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) strategy requires shifting airbase defense from a passive measure to an offensive enabler. The core finding is that developing layered missile defenses, particularly directed energy weapons, at critical air installations can neutralize the threat posed by Chinese forces like the PLARF. By ensuring sustained airpower generation from forward bases, robust active defense restores U.S. air dominance and significantly undercuts China’s maritime ambitions. Strategically, this approach is necessary to project decisive power needed to control global commons and counter Beijing's expansionism.
-
21.Defeating the Drones: The Airman’s Imperative to Defend from Small Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles (Mitchell)
Small Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles (sUAV) pose a rapidly evolving and critical air threat that traditional point defenses are ill-equipped to handle. Due to their massive numbers, low-altitude flight paths, and rapid innovation cycles, sUAV necessitate a fundamental shift in counterair doctrine. The recommended strategy is a 'system-of-systems' approach, integrating layered detection with both kinetic and non-kinetic effectors, supported by resilient command and control. For the U.S. Air Force to maintain airpower superiority, it must reconceptualize its operations under this comprehensive framework, requiring Congress to provide substantial monetary and personnel resources for implementation.
-
22.
The paper argues that a strategic U.S.–India partnership is vital for stabilizing the Indo-Pacific and advancing critical technologies. Key reasoning centers on leveraging joint efforts to rapidly mature space, air, and defense capabilities, such as reusable VTOL vehicles, which offer unprecedented global reach and cost efficiency. Strategically, this collaboration must extend beyond military cooperation to include building a 21st-century economic engine, opening the commercial space frontier, and collectively countering China's regional aggression to ensure lasting peace.
-
23.Space Superiority Through the Spectrum of Conflict: Findings and Recommendations from the Conflict in Space Workshop (Mitchell)
The Mitchell Institute argues that the United States is already operating in a sustained 'gray zone' of space conflict, particularly concerning China. This ambiguity stems from space’s inability to conform to traditional legal or geographic constructs, which complicates attribution and allows adversaries to normalize coercive actions below clear thresholds of armed conflict. To counter this strategic challenge, the report recommends building combat credibility by establishing clearer international norms and frameworks, integrating allied forces and commercial partners, enhancing mission resilience, and sharpening decision-making processes.
-
24.
The article argues that advanced adversary capabilities, including long-range strikes and electronic warfare, threaten the viability of fixed Command and Control (C2) nodes, risking a collapse in situational awareness. To counter this, the U.S. military must transition to a resilient, mobile, and federated C2 grid. This comprehensive approach integrates three layers: tanker-hosted airborne nodes for standoff bridging, low-cost aerial vehicles for meshed networking, and mobile ground sensors. Implementing this distributed architecture is critical for maintaining decision advantage and ensuring that modern sensing and communication assets remain operational at the tactical edge.
-
25.
The Mitchell Institute argues that military human spaceflight is critical for maintaining U.S. space superiority amid intense competition with China. The paper notes that China's consistent, military-led lunar and space ambitions pose a credible threat, contrasting sharply with the perceived policy and funding inconsistencies that have hampered U.S. space programs. To counter this disparity, the U.S. must develop a 'Guardian' spaceflight capability, utilizing LEO stations and commercial partnerships. This strategic shift is necessary to accelerate national defense requirements, preserve American leadership, and secure the space domain.
-
26.
The Mitchell Institute argues that the U.S. Air Force requires a comprehensive modernization effort to maintain a balanced force mix capable of defeating a peer adversary in high-intensity conflict. This necessity is underscored by a wargame comparing alternative force designs for 2035, which informed the recommendations. Strategically, the report urges Congress and the Department of Defense to make difficult choices regarding future force design. Policy must prioritize investments in fifth-generation combat aircraft, autonomous systems, and advanced guided munitions to ensure the service can simultaneously defend the homeland and deter major power aggression.
-
27.Aerospace Power Facts & Figures The Mitchell Institute’s research studies, policy reports, and forum papers. (Mitchell)
The Mitchell Institute’s research emphasizes that U.S. aerospace power is currently facing strategic and budgetary challenges comparable to those of the Cold War era. The analysis argues that the Air Force budget may be insufficient to maintain the technological and operational edge necessary for modern power projection, especially as the domain becomes increasingly information-centric. Key evidence points to a disconnect between federal defense spending priorities and the actual requirements for sustaining a dominant aerospace force. These findings imply that without a significant shift in policy and investment, the U.S. risks losing its primary tactical and strategic advantages in future conflicts.
-
28.
The Mitchell Institute argues that the U.S. Air Force requires significant investment in long-range, stealthy penetrating airpower to effectively deny adversaries operational sanctuaries. It asserts that decades of force cuts and deferred modernization have degraded combat capacity, leaving the service unable to simultaneously meet multiple strategic defense objectives. Consequently, scaling these advanced capabilities is presented as a critical national choice necessary to maintain deterrence and ensure victory in future conflicts.
-
29.In the News & Commentary The Mitchell Institute’s editorials, media articles featuring Mitchell expertise, and other content. (Mitchell)
The Mitchell Institute highlights that the ongoing conflict with Iran, specifically Operation Epic Fury, underscores the decisive role of space and cyber capabilities in modern high-intensity combat. These 'invisible' forces were instrumental in enabling strikes against over 1,000 targets, demonstrating the strategic advantage of multi-domain integration. However, the reports also highlight the inherent risks of complex air operations, as seen in a significant friendly fire incident between Kuwaiti and U.S. forces. Policy focus must therefore balance the pursuit of technological dominance in non-kinetic domains with rigorous improvements in multi-national tactical coordination.
-
30.
The Mitchell Institute's China Airpower Tracker highlights the rapid transformation of the People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) from a regional defensive service into a sophisticated force capable of projecting power beyond the First Island Chain. By integrating advanced aircraft, uncrewed systems, and mobile long-range surface-to-air missiles across five theater commands, China has significantly enhanced its aerial combat and denial capabilities. This tool provides a visualization of PLAAF airbases and SAM sites, emphasizing the strategic importance of China's road-mobile assets and their implications for survivability and power projection in a potential conflict.
-
31.
The Mitchell Institute asserts that space superiority is a foundational requirement for U.S. military operations, currently threatened by advancing Chinese and Russian counterspace capabilities. To mitigate these risks, the paper argues that the Department of Defense must clarify institutional roles and prioritize cross-domain investments to improve the survivability of the U.S. space architecture. Furthermore, the institute recommends a cultural shift towards treating space as a true warfighting domain, necessitating the integration of contested space scenarios into major military training exercises. These reforms are considered urgent to ensure the United States can maintain its strategic advantage in a linchpin domain.
-
32.
The Mitchell Institute report warns that the U.S. Air Force airlift system currently lacks the capacity and specific aircraft mix required to sustain combat operations against a peer competitor in highly contested environments. The analysis highlights that decades of underfunding and the geographical expanse of the Indo-Pacific have severely degraded the nation's mobility enterprise, posing a significant risk to global military operations. Consequently, the author advocates for immediate, multi-year investments to expand fleet capacity and restore the strategic mobility backbone essential for national defense.
-
33.
The paper argues that the U.S. homeland faces an acute and growing threat from advanced, long-range missile technologies fielded by Russia and China, with the Arctic identified as the most vulnerable attack corridor. The analysis notes that outdated Cold War-era defense systems are insufficient, as modern threats are far more diverse and difficult to detect than previous adversaries. To secure its northern flank, the U.S. must urgently rebuild its defenses by establishing a modern, integrated enterprise that utilizes diverse air, surface, and space sensors to achieve real-time, multi-domain domain awareness.
-
34.Winning the Next War: Overcoming the U.S. Air Force’s Capacity, Capability, and Readiness Crisis (Mitchell)
The Mitchell Institute argues that the U.S. Air Force has entered a severe force-generation crisis, describing it as the oldest, smallest, and least ready in its history at a time of rising peer threats. The report’s core reasoning is that deterrence and warfighting credibility depend on balancing three linked factors: sufficient force size, modern combat capability, and day-to-day readiness, and that current shortfalls across all three create unacceptable operational risk. It recommends a dual fiscal shift: increase top-line Air Force funding and reallocate internal spending from RDT&E toward procurement and operations and maintenance to rebuild near-term combat readiness. Strategically, the paper warns that failing to act now will raise the probability of major U.S. losses in a future high-end conflict and weaken U.S. deterrence posture.
-
35.A Broader Look at Dynamic Space Operations: Creating Multi-Dimensional Dilemmas for Adversaries (Mitchell)
The report argues that the United States must shift from legacy, static space operations to dynamic space operations (DSO) to preserve space superiority in an increasingly contested warfighting domain. It reasons that older architectures were designed for a benign environment, while current threats and mission demands require capabilities that can rapidly and frequently change orbital and operational parameters. According to the study, broad use of DSO would improve resilience, flexibility, and mission effectiveness by enabling maneuver, surprise, and novel mission approaches that complicate adversary planning. Strategically, the implication is that accelerating DSO adoption is urgent for deterrence and for protecting the space-enabled foundation of U.S. joint military operations.