China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
Europe Should Not Be the Example for App Store Regulation
English Summary
The article argues that proposed app store regulations, such as the App Store Freedom Act (ASFA), are misguided because they impose a counterproductive 'one-size-fits-all' model on digital markets. Key criticisms include how these mandates undermine genuine competition by forcing third-party payment systems and homogenizing business models, thereby harming stores reliant on third-party apps. Furthermore, the bill’s prohibition on price matching removes a critical competitive mechanism used in both physical and digital retail. Ultimately, adopting such sweeping regulations risks reducing consumer choice, stifling diverse business practices, and significantly increasing cybersecurity vulnerabilities by compromising secure operating environments.
中文摘要
本文主張，諸如《應用程式商店自由法案》（App Store Freedom Act, ASFA）等擬議的應用程式商店監管規定是誤導性的，因為它們對數位市場實施了「一體適用」的、缺乏彈性的模式。主要批評指出，這些強制性規定透過強迫採用第三方支付系統和使商業模式同質化，從而削弱了真正的競爭力，進而損害了依賴第三方應用程式的商店。此外，該法案禁止價格比對（price matching）機制，移除了實體及數位零售業都用到的關鍵競爭手段。最終而言，採納如此全面性的監管規定，有使消費者選擇減少、阻礙多元商業實踐，並透過損害安全的營運環境而顯著提高網路安全漏洞的風險。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.
-
3.
The article analyzes the deep ideological split within the Democratic Party regarding the future of U.S. foreign policy, pitting centrists against progressives. Centrists generally advocate for restoring a reformed U.S.-led international order and strengthening alliances, while progressives argue for a multipolar world that prioritizes transnational threats like climate change and AI over geopolitical competition. This division is most pronounced in the Middle East, where centrists push for greater pressure on Israel and a regional settlement, a shift largely welcomed by progressives. The core finding is that these internal debates threaten to consume a future administration with indecision, making it difficult for the U.S. to project a coherent and unified global strategy.
-
4.
The 2026 midterms are expected to dramatically tighten the regulatory environment for data center development, shifting power away from developers and toward local communities. This shift is fueled by rising public opposition, leading to local moratoriums, and potential legislative actions such as repealing tax exemptions and mandating that developers cover full energy costs (ratepayer protection). Consequently, the industry faces increased operational and construction costs, stricter permitting requirements, and mandatory community engagement protocols. These changes suggest a move toward greater regulatory oversight, particularly regarding energy use and the mandatory disclosure of AI activities.
-
5.
The Brookings report argues that the U.S.'s historical 'exorbitant privilege'—its ability to issue debt cheaply—is steadily eroding. Key evidence shows a decline in the U.S. convenience yield relative to G10 peers, a trend linked to rising domestic debt and global fiscal stress. While recent global interest rate hikes have temporarily improved the U.S.'s relative borrowing appeal, the underlying loss of cheap credit suggests potential future higher borrowing costs for the government and poses long-term risks to the dollar's status as a reserve currency.