The publication argues that current efforts to improve the well-being of men and boys of color are too fragmented, failing to account for the structural linkages between systems like education, employment, and criminal justice. It proposes a new, holistic framework that traces how structural conditions flow through multiple domains to measurable outcomes, such as longevity. Key reasoning emphasizes the need to treat 'place' as a fundamental actor and to identify successful communities where these populations are already thriving. Policy implications require shifting away from individual-focused interventions toward developing structural, place-based agendas that address systemic inequities.
Why more states are passing laws to help people drive less
English Summary
States across the Americas are recognizing that the traditional link between high Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and economic growth is fracturing, leading to a policy shift toward mitigation. Key evidence shows that excessive driving generates negative externalities, including increased pollution, higher maintenance costs, and unsustainable GHG emissions. Consequently, states are passing varied laws—ranging from project-level mandates (California) to statewide planning constraints (Colorado)—to force transportation planning to prioritize VMT reduction. The implication for policy is that future infrastructure investment must move beyond simply building more roads, instead requiring comprehensive, multimodal strategies that redirect funds toward public transit, cycling, and pedestrian infrastructure to achieve sustainable growth.
中文摘要
美洲各州已意識到，傳統上認為車輛行駛里程（VMT）與經濟增長之間存在關聯的模式正在瓦解，這引導了政策轉向減緩（mitigation）。關鍵證據顯示，過度的駕駛行為會產生負面外部性，包括增加污染、提高維護成本以及造成不可持續的溫室氣體（GHG）排放。因此，各州正在通過各種法規——範圍從項目層級的強制規定（如加州）到全州層級的規劃限制（如科羅拉多州）——來要求交通規劃必須將VMT的削減置於優先地位。政策上的啟示是，未來的基礎設施投資不能僅限於修建更多道路，而是必須採用全面的多模式策略，將資金重新導向公共交通、自行車道和行人基礎設施，以實現可持續增長。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
3.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.
-
4.
The article analyzes the deep ideological split within the Democratic Party regarding the future of U.S. foreign policy, pitting centrists against progressives. Centrists generally advocate for restoring a reformed U.S.-led international order and strengthening alliances, while progressives argue for a multipolar world that prioritizes transnational threats like climate change and AI over geopolitical competition. This division is most pronounced in the Middle East, where centrists push for greater pressure on Israel and a regional settlement, a shift largely welcomed by progressives. The core finding is that these internal debates threaten to consume a future administration with indecision, making it difficult for the U.S. to project a coherent and unified global strategy.
-
5.
The 2026 midterms are expected to dramatically tighten the regulatory environment for data center development, shifting power away from developers and toward local communities. This shift is fueled by rising public opposition, leading to local moratoriums, and potential legislative actions such as repealing tax exemptions and mandating that developers cover full energy costs (ratepayer protection). Consequently, the industry faces increased operational and construction costs, stricter permitting requirements, and mandatory community engagement protocols. These changes suggest a move toward greater regulatory oversight, particularly regarding energy use and the mandatory disclosure of AI activities.