The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
RIMPAC 2026 Kicks off in Hawaii
English Summary
RIMPAC 2026, the world's premier multinational maritime exercise, emphasizes strengthening collective security and interoperability among allies across the Pacific region. The event’s scale—involving thousands of personnel and diverse drills from anti-submarine warfare to HADR—underscores a commitment to maintaining a free and open Indo-Pacific. Strategically, RIMPAC is evolving beyond traditional exercises by integrating advanced technologies, including autonomous surface vessels (USVs) and AI systems for logistics and combat operations. This focus on combined readiness and technological integration signals that future maritime strategy will require deep alliance cooperation coupled with rapid adoption of unmanned capabilities.
中文摘要
RIMPAC 2026，作為全球頂級的跨國海軍演習，著重於加強太平洋地區盟友之間的集體安全和互操作性。該演習規模宏大——涉及數千名人員，並涵蓋從反潛戰到人道援助與災難響應（HADR）等多樣化訓練——突顯了維護一個自由開放的印太地區的堅定承諾。在戰略層面，RIMPAC正超越傳統演習範疇，整合先進技術，包括自主水面艦艇（USVs）以及用於後勤和作戰的AI系統。這種對綜合戰備狀態與技術整合的關注表明，未來的海事戰略需要深厚的聯盟合作，並結合快速採納無人系統的能力。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.