The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Report to Congress on North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons and Missile Programs
English Summary
The USNI report, based on Congressional research, concludes that North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs have significantly advanced, posing an escalating threat to the U.S. Homeland and key allies. This advancement is fueled by increased Russian technological support in exchange for North Korea’s assistance in the Ukraine conflict, as highlighted by intelligence assessments. Despite ongoing sanctions and diplomatic efforts, North Korea remains committed to maintaining its nuclear arsenal, viewing it as essential for regime security. Consequently, policy responses should focus on reinforcing deterrence, closely monitoring Russian influence, and maintaining a firm commitment to denuclearization alongside strategic adjustments to U.S. and allied force posture.
中文摘要
美國海軍學會（USNI）報告，基於國會研究，結論指出，朝鮮的核彈和飛彈計劃已顯著進步，對美國本土和關鍵盟友構成日益加劇的威脅。這一進步得益於俄羅斯增加技術支持，以換取朝鮮在烏克蘭衝突中的協助，正如最新的情報評估所強調的。儘管持續的制裁和外交努力，朝鮮仍堅定地致力於維持其核武庫，視其為維持政權安全所必需。因此，政策應當著重於加強威懾、密切監控俄羅斯影響，並維持對非核化堅定承諾，同時對美國和盟友的作戰力量部署進行戰略調整。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.