The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
Estimating the current and future size of the UK bereaved Armed Forces community
English Summary
This RAND report provides the first comprehensive estimate of the UK Armed Forces bereaved community—over 100,000 people annually as of 2025—including partners, children, and service personnel/veterans who have lost family members. Using Ministry of Defence mortality data and Bayesian forecasting methods, the study estimates that partners bereaved of veterans comprise the largest group (53,100 annually), while the overall bereaved population will decline by 2045 due to aging demographics. The research highlights critical data gaps and emphasizes that a major conflict would substantially increase bereaved family members in younger age groups, fundamentally altering support needs. Support providers must prepare for demographic shifts and recognize the bereaved as a vital but historically overlooked part of the Armed Forces community requiring targeted long-term services.
中文摘要
本蘭德公司報告提供了英國武裝部隊喪親社群的首份全面估計—截至2025年每年超過10萬人—包括伴侶、子女以及失去家庭成員的軍職人員和退役軍人。該研究利用國防部死亡率數據和貝氏預測方法，估計失去伴侶的退役軍人家屬構成最大群體（每年53,100人），而整體喪親人口將因人口老齡化在2045年前下降。研究強調了關鍵的數據缺口，並指出重大衝突將大幅增加年輕年齡組的喪親家庭成員，從根本上改變對支援服務的需求。支援服務提供者必須為人口結構轉變做準備，並認可喪親者是武裝部隊社群中不可或缺但歷來被忽視的一部分，需要提供有針對性的長期服務。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Chatham House analysis concludes that the UK's Defence Investment Plan (DIP) will be viewed by NATO allies as a mixed bag, primarily due to its failure to commit to higher GDP spending targets. However, the plan signals critical strategic improvements by emphasizing novel technologies—such as autonomous systems and digital infrastructure—and enhancing readiness. Crucially, the DIP adopts an international focus through major collaborative programs (e.g., AUKUS, GCAP) and establishes a new National Armaments Director Group (NADG). This structural shift toward flexible, portfolio-based collaboration is strategically valuable for NATO allies seeking reliable partners as US conventional forces reduce their European presence.
-
3.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
4.
The article argues that while Ukraine's deep strikes and Russia's mounting economic instability create a window for peace talks, President Putin remains committed to maximalist demands and may escalate conflict through increased air assaults. Key evidence supporting this tension includes the strain on Russian energy infrastructure versus Moscow's refusal to negotiate in good faith, preferring instead to expand its claims. Consequently, the immediate strategic implication is that Washington must lead intensive diplomacy—a 'shuttle diplomacy'—to establish a framework agreement centered on a ceasefire along current lines and defining long-term European security arrangements.
-
5.
Russia utilizes long-range missile and drone strikes as a sophisticated coercive strategy, concentrating attacks on critical geographical nodes—including energy grids, ports, industrial centers, and major urban areas—to impose cumulative costs. This campaign aims to degrade Ukraine's logistics, strain its infrastructure, and apply sustained psychological pressure rather than achieving rapid military victory. The analysis suggests that modern coercion leverages civilian vulnerability and systemic damage as primary tools of geopolitical leverage, weakening the adversary’s ability to govern or sustain resistance. Policymakers must recognize this shift toward using economic and infrastructural attrition to achieve strategic political outcomes.