The Chatham House report argues that climate change represents Europe's greatest systemic security threat, citing recent extreme heatwaves, droughts, and wildfires that have caused massive economic losses, infrastructure failures, and excess deaths. These environmental shocks disrupt critical services (like energy supply) and increase vulnerability to non-conventional threats, forcing military resources to divert personnel away from traditional defense roles. To counter this, the report mandates a comprehensive security approach: treating climate adaptation as core national security spending, accelerating decarbonization to address root causes, and building robust societal resilience through coordinated civil preparedness.
The Coming Crisis In Russias Political Economy
English Summary
The paper argues that Russia's war on Ukraine is economically unsustainable, forcing the Kremlin to choose between radical escalation or scaling back its war aims. Key evidence points to severe resource constraints, labor shortages, and the high cost of modern military production, which is straining state finances and depressing civilian sectors. To sustain the conflict, Russia must resort to highly disruptive, command-like measures that curtail market freedoms and civil liberties. These necessary internal controls carry major risks for regime stability, suggesting that the Kremlin will intensify its grip on both the population and the elite.
中文摘要
本文論述俄羅斯對烏克蘭的戰爭在經濟上難以持續,迫使克里姆林宮必須在激進升級或縮減戰爭目標之間做出選擇。關鍵證據指出,嚴重的資源限制、勞動力短缺以及現代軍事生產的高成本,正在拖累國家財政,並壓抑民用部門。若要維持衝突,俄羅斯必須訴諸高度干預市場、限制市場自由和公民權利的命令式措施。這些必要的內部管制對政權穩定性構成重大風險,暗示著克里姆林宮將會加強對民眾和精英階層的控制。
Related Entries
-
1.Wildfires and extreme heat show climate change is now Europe’s biggest security threat (Chatham House)
-
2.Critical minerals need secure supply chains – increasingly that depends on responsible production (Chatham House)
The security of critical mineral supply chains is increasingly dependent on responsible production practices, which are threatened by global geo-economic competition and climate change. Rapidly increasing demand for materials, coupled with geopolitical tensions, has led to a rise in human rights abuses and informal mining activities in producer states. To mitigate systemic risks, governments must avoid a 'race to the bottom' on standards and instead mandate universal adherence to responsible corporate action. Ultimately, the article argues that successful supply chain resilience requires engaging seriously with host countries, as producer nations are now taking the lead in setting global standards.
-
3.
The article argues that despite political volatility and threats from figures like Trump, the transatlantic alliance is fundamentally robust because both the US and Europe share critical mutual interests. This bond is sustained by deep economic ties ($2T+ trade) and the shared necessity of deterring Russian aggression on NATO's eastern flank, which makes a strategic divorce highly unlikely. For policy, Europe must adopt a strategy of pragmatic engagement—working within current political realities while aggressively increasing its defense spending to build capability. While self-reliance is necessary, the analysis cautions that true strategic autonomy remains politically challenging and requires continued reliance on US military power.
-
4.
Europe has emerged as a global leader in sanctioning Russia's 'shadow fleet,' significantly increasing its vessel designations and improving coordination with the UK and U.S. However, the analysis finds that these European sanctions alone have had only a limited impact on overall Russian oil exports from the Baltic Sea due to gaps in coverage. To maximize pressure on Russian revenue, the report argues that comprehensive action requires either the U.S. implementing broader secondary sanctions or Europe aggressively holding flag states accountable for oversight of flagged vessels. Collectively, these measures are necessary to significantly strengthen the enforcement of G7 price caps and constrain Russia's oil trade.
-
5.
The historical trajectory of U.S.-Canada relations reveals a persistent tension between deep economic interdependence and the maintenance of national sovereignty. Key evidence includes major security pacts like NORAD, which cemented continental defense cooperation, alongside massive trade agreements such as NAFTA and the Auto Pact, which created an integrated market. However, this integration is repeatedly challenged by disputes over tariffs (Smoot-Hawley), territorial claims (Northwest Passage), and perceived loss of autonomy. Strategically, the enduring nature of these ties suggests that while friction points will persist, cooperation remains mandatory for both economies, necessitating policy frameworks that balance shared prosperity with respect for distinct national interests.