The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Great Power Diplomacy: The Skill of Statecraft From Attila the Hun to Kissinger
English Summary
The article posits that in the current era of great-power competition, diplomacy must be understood not merely as communication, but as a sophisticated exercise in grand strategy. Historically, successful statecraft—as demonstrated by figures from Bismarck to the Byzantines—requires leaders to build complex alliances and coalitions to offset limited national capabilities. This strategic process involves restricting the operational space of adversaries while integrating diplomatic goals with both military and economic power. Consequently, the analysis stresses that mastering this comprehensive art of statecraft is increasingly vital for managing threats and maintaining stability in a fractured global order.
中文摘要
本文提出，在當前大國競爭的時代，外交不能僅被視為溝通，而必須被理解為一門複雜的「大戰略」實踐。從歷史角度來看，成功的治國方略——無論是拜斯馬克還是拜占庭帝國的典範——都要求領導人建立複雜的聯盟與集團，以彌補國家能力上的局限性。這一戰略過程涉及限制敵對方的行動空間，並將外交目標與軍事及經濟力量相整合。因此，本文分析強調，掌握這門全面的治國藝術，對於管理當前的威脅並維持碎片化的全球秩序穩定性，正變得越來越關鍵。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The article analyzes the deep ideological split within the Democratic Party regarding the future of U.S. foreign policy, pitting centrists against progressives. Centrists generally advocate for restoring a reformed U.S.-led international order and strengthening alliances, while progressives argue for a multipolar world that prioritizes transnational threats like climate change and AI over geopolitical competition. This division is most pronounced in the Middle East, where centrists push for greater pressure on Israel and a regional settlement, a shift largely welcomed by progressives. The core finding is that these internal debates threaten to consume a future administration with indecision, making it difficult for the U.S. to project a coherent and unified global strategy.
-
5.
Washington's increasing diplomatic and economic support for Morocco's claims over Western Sahara is significantly undermining regional peace efforts and exacerbating existing tensions. This alignment, which sidelines the UN's mandate (MINURSO) and solidifies a pro-Moroccan bloc, is evidenced by U.S. funding and political efforts to undermine the Polisario movement. Critically, this perceived bias is prompting regional rivals, particularly Algeria, to increase their own military and diplomatic involvement to counter the growing influence of the Morocco-Israel axis. Ultimately, the article warns that Washington's zero-sum approach of choosing sides, while aiming for stability, is likely to worsen the conflict outlook across the fragile North African continent.