The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Enduring Hostility: The Making of America’s Iran Policy
English Summary
The article argues that U.S. policy toward Iran is rooted in historical trauma, specifically the humiliations of the Iranian Revolution and subsequent geopolitical crises. This history has fostered a deep-seated belief among policymakers that Iran is an 'abnormal state' that can only be managed through coercion, making conventional diplomacy impossible. The author suggests that this enduring hostility, driven by inertia and risk aversion, has prevented the U.S. from pursuing less costly and potentially more effective engagement strategies. Ultimately, the analysis critiques Washington's inability to act rationally in its national interest regarding the region.
中文摘要
本文論述美國對伊朗的政策，其根源植於歷史創傷，特別是伊朗革命帶來的屈辱感以及隨後的地緣政治危機。這種歷史背景培養出政策制定者一種根深蒂固的信念，即伊朗是一個「異常國家」，只能透過強制手段進行管理，使得傳統外交難以實施。作者指出，這種由慣性與風險規避所驅動的持久敵意，阻礙了美國追求成本更低且潛在更有效的接觸策略。最終，本文批判了華盛頓在國家利益層面上，缺乏理性行動的能力。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
5.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.