The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Mistaking Order for Anarchy: Territory, Mobility, and Security in the Sahel
English Summary
The article argues that Western academic and interventionist efforts often misdiagnose the Sahel's security challenges by mistakenly equating 'order' with rigid, European-style territorial sovereignty. Historically, the imposition of centralized, territorial governance ignored the reality that local security and order have traditionally relied on non-territorial social structures, such as alliances with pastoral nomadic groups. This flawed premise has led to failed peacekeeping missions and reinforced the misperception that the Sahel is inherently 'ungoverned' and requires external intervention. Policymakers must therefore shift focus away from purely territorial control models and instead support local, non-state mechanisms for consolidating social relations and security.
中文摘要
本文論述西方學術界和干預行動經常誤判薩赫勒地區的安全挑戰，其錯誤地將「秩序」等同於僵化的、歐洲式的領土主權。從歷史上看，強制實施的中央集權領土治理模式，忽略了當地安全與秩序傳統上依賴於非領土社會結構的事實，例如與遊牧牧民群體的聯盟。這種有缺陷的前提導致了和平維護任務的失敗，並加深了「薩赫勒地區本質上是『失治』並需要外部干預」的誤解。因此，政策制定者必須將重點從純粹的領土控制模式轉移開來，轉而支持地方的、非國家層面的機制，以鞏固社會關係和安全。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The article analyzes the deep ideological split within the Democratic Party regarding the future of U.S. foreign policy, pitting centrists against progressives. Centrists generally advocate for restoring a reformed U.S.-led international order and strengthening alliances, while progressives argue for a multipolar world that prioritizes transnational threats like climate change and AI over geopolitical competition. This division is most pronounced in the Middle East, where centrists push for greater pressure on Israel and a regional settlement, a shift largely welcomed by progressives. The core finding is that these internal debates threaten to consume a future administration with indecision, making it difficult for the U.S. to project a coherent and unified global strategy.
-
5.
The article argues that the Nordic model of deep, regional military cooperation (minilateralism) provides a crucial blueprint for sustaining NATO's collective defense against escalating Russian threats. This success is evidenced by the Nordic states' transition from cost-saving measures to a unified security imperative, establishing integrated command structures and specialized regional roles. Policy-wise, the report urges NATO to replicate this regionalization approach in other frontline areas, such as the Baltic and Black Seas. Establishing these subregional 'deterrence clusters' would enhance local response capabilities, strengthen the alliance's overall posture, and provide a vital hedge against potential paralysis of the main NATO structure.