The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
Scenes From a Roman Century, 1924–2024
English Summary
The book chronicles Rome's dramatic transformation over the last century, using vignettes to trace its evolution from a culturally rich center to a volatile, heavily commercialized tourist destination. Key evidence includes documenting periods of intense political violence, such as fascist killings, WWII urban warfare, and modern mafia activity, alongside the city's deindustrialization. The narrative highlights the tension between Rome's ancient cultural significance and its modern struggle with over-tourism and cultural erosion. For policy, the work underscores the critical need for urban governance models that balance economic development with cultural preservation and historical integrity.
中文摘要
本書描繪了羅馬在過去一個世紀的戲劇性轉變，透過一系列短篇描寫，追溯了其從一個文化豐富的中心，逐漸演變為一個不穩定、高度商業化的旅遊目的地。關鍵證據包括記錄了不同時期的政治暴力，例如法西斯時期的大規模殺戮、二戰期間的城市戰鬥，以及現代的黑幫活動，同時也涵蓋了該城市的去工業化過程。敘事重點突顯了羅馬古老文化意義與其現代應對過度觀光及文化侵蝕的掙扎之間的巨大張力。就政策層面而言，本書強調了城市治理模式的關鍵需求，即必須在經濟發展、文化保護和歷史完整性之間取得平衡。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Chatham House analysis concludes that the UK's Defence Investment Plan (DIP) will be viewed by NATO allies as a mixed bag, primarily due to its failure to commit to higher GDP spending targets. However, the plan signals critical strategic improvements by emphasizing novel technologies—such as autonomous systems and digital infrastructure—and enhancing readiness. Crucially, the DIP adopts an international focus through major collaborative programs (e.g., AUKUS, GCAP) and establishes a new National Armaments Director Group (NADG). This structural shift toward flexible, portfolio-based collaboration is strategically valuable for NATO allies seeking reliable partners as US conventional forces reduce their European presence.
-
3.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
4.
The article argues that while Ukraine's deep strikes and Russia's mounting economic instability create a window for peace talks, President Putin remains committed to maximalist demands and may escalate conflict through increased air assaults. Key evidence supporting this tension includes the strain on Russian energy infrastructure versus Moscow's refusal to negotiate in good faith, preferring instead to expand its claims. Consequently, the immediate strategic implication is that Washington must lead intensive diplomacy—a 'shuttle diplomacy'—to establish a framework agreement centered on a ceasefire along current lines and defining long-term European security arrangements.
-
5.
Myanmar has collapsed into Asia’s deadliest conflict, marked by massive economic collapse, widespread famine, and extreme brutality from the military junta. Despite this catastrophic humanitarian crisis, international actors—including major powers and regional blocs like ASEAN—are largely ignoring or withdrawing support for democratic forces. This neglect allows the junta to consolidate power, receiving critical military aid from authoritarian allies such as Russia and Belarus. Policy implications suggest that global indifference is enabling a failed state environment, making Myanmar a highly volatile flashpoint whose instability threatens broader Indo-Pacific security.