The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
Strange Stability: How Cold War Scientists Set Out to Control the Arms Race and Ended Up Serving the Military-Industrial Complex
English Summary
The analysis examines how Cold War scientists reframed nuclear policy, arguing that the goal was not disarmament, but rather stabilizing the arms race through controlled deterrence. While these thinkers provided valuable intellectual frameworks for policymakers, their actual influence on nuclear decision-making was less pronounced than commonly believed. The core finding is that the concept of 'stability' allowed analysts to organize thought, even if they were skeptical of total disarmament. For policy, this suggests that understanding the political dynamics that sideline scientific input is crucial for developing modern arms control strategies and managing great power competition.
中文摘要
本分析探討了冷戰科學家如何重新定義核政策，其論點認為其目的並非實現裁軍，而是透過受控威懾來穩定軍備競賽。儘管這些思想家為政策制定者提供了寶貴的知識框架，但他們在核決策過程中的實際影響力，不如一般普遍認為的那麼顯著。核心發現指出，「穩定性」這一概念使分析師能夠組織思維，即使他們對徹底的裁軍持懷疑態度。對於政策制定而言，這表明了解那些將科學輸入排除在外的政治動態，對於發展現代軍備控制戰略和管理大國競爭至關重要。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Chatham House analysis concludes that the UK's Defence Investment Plan (DIP) will be viewed by NATO allies as a mixed bag, primarily due to its failure to commit to higher GDP spending targets. However, the plan signals critical strategic improvements by emphasizing novel technologies—such as autonomous systems and digital infrastructure—and enhancing readiness. Crucially, the DIP adopts an international focus through major collaborative programs (e.g., AUKUS, GCAP) and establishes a new National Armaments Director Group (NADG). This structural shift toward flexible, portfolio-based collaboration is strategically valuable for NATO allies seeking reliable partners as US conventional forces reduce their European presence.
-
3.
Russia utilizes long-range missile and drone strikes as a sophisticated coercive strategy, concentrating attacks on critical geographical nodes—including energy grids, ports, industrial centers, and major urban areas—to impose cumulative costs. This campaign aims to degrade Ukraine's logistics, strain its infrastructure, and apply sustained psychological pressure rather than achieving rapid military victory. The analysis suggests that modern coercion leverages civilian vulnerability and systemic damage as primary tools of geopolitical leverage, weakening the adversary’s ability to govern or sustain resistance. Policymakers must recognize this shift toward using economic and infrastructural attrition to achieve strategic political outcomes.
-
4.
The analysis argues that NATO faces an existential crisis due to perceived U.S. decoupling and uneven European commitment to collective defense. Key evidence includes calls for higher defense spending, coupled with US reviews of troop presence in Europe and allied nations' struggle to independently fill critical strategic gaps (e.g., air defense). For the alliance to remain viable, the summit must establish a clear roadmap for burden-sharing and reaffirm the credibility of the U.S. nuclear guarantee. Failure to address these structural deficiencies risks reducing NATO to an ineffective 'zombie alliance.'
-
5.
The analysis argues that Iran's long-standing political and military influence in Iraq is rapidly diminishing due to internal shifts and growing Iraqi resentment over foreign interference. Key evidence includes prominent Iranian-backed militias beginning to disarm or integrate with state forces, signaling a loss of independent power and control within the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF). This shift suggests that Baghdad is prioritizing national sovereignty and centralizing authority, allowing Iraq to potentially pivot its economic and political alignment toward the wider Gulf region. The primary implication is that Iran will lose its ability to use Iraq as a stable staging ground for projecting regional power, significantly weakening its broader 'axis of resistance.'