The Chatham House report argues that climate change represents Europe's greatest systemic security threat, citing recent extreme heatwaves, droughts, and wildfires that have caused massive economic losses, infrastructure failures, and excess deaths. These environmental shocks disrupt critical services (like energy supply) and increase vulnerability to non-conventional threats, forcing military resources to divert personnel away from traditional defense roles. To counter this, the report mandates a comprehensive security approach: treating climate adaptation as core national security spending, accelerating decarbonization to address root causes, and building robust societal resilience through coordinated civil preparedness.
The Oak and the Larch: A Forest History of Russia and Its Empires
English Summary
The book argues that Russia's vast forests are not merely environmental features, but rather a fundamental, dynamic element that has shaped its political history, identity, and resilience. Key evidence spans centuries, illustrating how these forests have served as crucial refuges for dissidents, bases for military resistance (from anti-invader groups to WWII partisans), and even the silent backdrop for the Soviet Union's dissolution. Strategically, this suggests that Russia's geopolitical vulnerabilities and internal resistance movements are deeply intertwined with its natural environment, making environmental and cultural factors critical variables in any assessment of Russian state stability or foreign policy.
中文摘要
本書論述俄羅斯廣袤的森林不僅僅是環境特徵,更是一個根本且動態的要素,深刻形塑了其政治歷史、國家認同和韌性。關鍵證據跨越了數個世紀,闡明了這些森林如何充當了異議人士的關鍵避難所、軍事抵抗的基地(從反入侵者團體到二戰時期游擊隊),甚至成為了蘇聯解體時的無聲背景。從戰略角度來看,這表明俄羅斯的地緣政治脆弱性與其內部抵抗運動,與其自然環境息息相關,使得環境和文化因素成為評估俄羅斯國家穩定性或外交政策時不可或缺的關鍵變數。
Related Entries
-
1.Wildfires and extreme heat show climate change is now Europe’s biggest security threat (Chatham House)
-
2.Critical minerals need secure supply chains – increasingly that depends on responsible production (Chatham House)
The security of critical mineral supply chains is increasingly dependent on responsible production practices, which are threatened by global geo-economic competition and climate change. Rapidly increasing demand for materials, coupled with geopolitical tensions, has led to a rise in human rights abuses and informal mining activities in producer states. To mitigate systemic risks, governments must avoid a 'race to the bottom' on standards and instead mandate universal adherence to responsible corporate action. Ultimately, the article argues that successful supply chain resilience requires engaging seriously with host countries, as producer nations are now taking the lead in setting global standards.
-
3.
The article argues that despite political volatility and threats from figures like Trump, the transatlantic alliance is fundamentally robust because both the US and Europe share critical mutual interests. This bond is sustained by deep economic ties ($2T+ trade) and the shared necessity of deterring Russian aggression on NATO's eastern flank, which makes a strategic divorce highly unlikely. For policy, Europe must adopt a strategy of pragmatic engagement—working within current political realities while aggressively increasing its defense spending to build capability. While self-reliance is necessary, the analysis cautions that true strategic autonomy remains politically challenging and requires continued reliance on US military power.
-
4.
Europe has emerged as a global leader in sanctioning Russia's 'shadow fleet,' significantly increasing its vessel designations and improving coordination with the UK and U.S. However, the analysis finds that these European sanctions alone have had only a limited impact on overall Russian oil exports from the Baltic Sea due to gaps in coverage. To maximize pressure on Russian revenue, the report argues that comprehensive action requires either the U.S. implementing broader secondary sanctions or Europe aggressively holding flag states accountable for oversight of flagged vessels. Collectively, these measures are necessary to significantly strengthen the enforcement of G7 price caps and constrain Russia's oil trade.
-
5.
The historical trajectory of U.S.-Canada relations reveals a persistent tension between deep economic interdependence and the maintenance of national sovereignty. Key evidence includes major security pacts like NORAD, which cemented continental defense cooperation, alongside massive trade agreements such as NAFTA and the Auto Pact, which created an integrated market. However, this integration is repeatedly challenged by disputes over tariffs (Smoot-Hawley), territorial claims (Northwest Passage), and perceived loss of autonomy. Strategically, the enduring nature of these ties suggests that while friction points will persist, cooperation remains mandatory for both economies, necessitating policy frameworks that balance shared prosperity with respect for distinct national interests.