ThinkTankWeekly

Heartland vs. Rimland

Foreign Affairs | 2026-07-02 | china_indopacific

Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

Visit original source

ThinkTankWeekly provides a curated entry and summary only. Full text and PDF remain on the publisher's website.

English Summary

The geopolitical landscape reflects a modern Heartland vs. Rimland conflict, where a loose, transactional Eurasian axis (led by China) challenges the US-anchored maritime order. This heartland does not rely on traditional conquest but instead weaponizes global interdependence—using cyberattacks and economic ties to weaken rimland alliances from within. While the rimland coalition is powerful, its internal divisions are exploitable; therefore, the primary strategic challenge for Washington must be rebuilding a resilient order that governs interdependence rather than merely containing armies. To succeed, US policy must fuse loose coalitions into a system that strengthens free societies and protects against coercion while resisting its own tendency toward illiberal protectionism.

中文摘要

地緣政治格局反映了現代的內陸核心區(Heartland)與周邊地帶(Rimland)之間的衝突,其中一個鬆散、實用主義的歐亞軸心(以中國為首)正在挑戰由美國錨定的海上秩序。這個「核心區」並非依賴傳統的征服,而是將全球互依性武器化——利用網路攻擊和經濟聯繫從內部削弱周邊地帶的聯盟。雖然周邊地帶的聯盟力量強大,但其內部分歧是可被利用的;因此,華盛頓的首要戰略挑戰必須是重建一個治理互依性的韌性秩序,而不僅僅是遏制軍事力量。為成功,美國政策必須將鬆散的聯盟整合為一個能強化自由社會、抵禦強制手段的體系,同時也要抵抗自身傾向於非自由主義式保護主義的趨勢。

Related Entries

  1. 1.
    2026-11-07 | defense | 2026-W45 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, United States

    The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  2. 2.
    2026-11-07 | middle_east | 2026-W45 | Topics: China, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  3. 3.
    2026-11-07 | economy | 2026-W45 | Topics: China, Europe, Trade

    China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  4. 4.
    2026-11-07 | economy | 2026-W45 | Topics: AI, China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.

    Read at CFR

  5. 5.
    2026-11-07 | economy | 2026-W45 | Topics: United States

    The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.

    Read at Brookings