The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Insecurity Politics: How Unstable Lives Lead to Populist Support
English Summary
The analysis argues that rising workplace and financial insecurity, driven by globalization, technological change, and austerity, is the primary factor fueling the rise of populist parties across Europe. Using new data, the research confirms that the erosion of socioeconomic stability directly undermines social well-being and boosts support for both far-left and far-right populist movements. While the findings suggest that addressing economic precarity is crucial for mitigating polarization, the paper notes that the specific drivers pushing voters toward the far-right remain unexplained. Policymakers must therefore prioritize strategies that restore socioeconomic stability to counter the appeal of populist rhetoric.
中文摘要
該分析指出，全球化、技術變革和緊縮財政所導致的職場和財務不安全感日益增加，是推動歐洲各國民粹主義政黨興起的首要因素。研究利用新數據證實，社會經濟穩定性的侵蝕直接損害了社會福祉，並提升了民眾對極左和極右民粹主義運動的支持度。儘管研究結果顯示，解決經濟脆弱性對於緩解政治極化至關重要，但該論文指出，推動選民走向極右翼的具體驅動因素仍有待解釋。因此，政策制定者必須優先實施恢復社會經濟穩定性的策略，以抵制民粹主義言論的吸引力。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.
-
5.
The article analyzes the deep ideological split within the Democratic Party regarding the future of U.S. foreign policy, pitting centrists against progressives. Centrists generally advocate for restoring a reformed U.S.-led international order and strengthening alliances, while progressives argue for a multipolar world that prioritizes transnational threats like climate change and AI over geopolitical competition. This division is most pronounced in the Middle East, where centrists push for greater pressure on Israel and a regional settlement, a shift largely welcomed by progressives. The core finding is that these internal debates threaten to consume a future administration with indecision, making it difficult for the U.S. to project a coherent and unified global strategy.