The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Ruining Revolution: How International Islamist and Salafi Forces Have Held Libya Hostage Since 2011
English Summary
The analysis argues that the political trajectory of militant Islamist groups in Libya is defined by their approach to power. Unlike the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood, which attempted to seize political control and contributed to government collapse through overreach, the Salafist groups eschewed formal politics. Instead, they built indispensable power by focusing on providing local services, particularly security, thereby controlling key militias across the country. This strategic non-involvement positions them not as kingmakers, but as powerful spoilers, capable of destabilizing the country regardless of which political faction ultimately prevails.
中文摘要
該分析指出，利比亞激進伊斯蘭主義團體的政治軌跡，取決於其掌握權力的方式。與試圖奪取政治控制權並因權力過度擴張導致政府崩潰的利比亞穆斯林兄弟會不同，薩拉夫派團體則規避了正式的政治參與。相反，他們透過專注於提供地方服務，特別是安全保障，從而控制了全國關鍵的民兵組織，建立了不可或缺的權力基礎。這種戰略性的不介入，使他們的角色並非是決定政局走向的關鍵推手（kingmakers），而是強大的破壞力量（spoilers），無論最終哪個政治派系佔了上風，他們都具備造成國家不穩定的能力。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
5.
The article analyzes the deep ideological split within the Democratic Party regarding the future of U.S. foreign policy, pitting centrists against progressives. Centrists generally advocate for restoring a reformed U.S.-led international order and strengthening alliances, while progressives argue for a multipolar world that prioritizes transnational threats like climate change and AI over geopolitical competition. This division is most pronounced in the Middle East, where centrists push for greater pressure on Israel and a regional settlement, a shift largely welcomed by progressives. The core finding is that these internal debates threaten to consume a future administration with indecision, making it difficult for the U.S. to project a coherent and unified global strategy.