The analysis argues that Iran's long-standing political and military influence in Iraq is rapidly diminishing due to internal shifts and growing Iraqi resentment over foreign interference. Key evidence includes prominent Iranian-backed militias beginning to disarm or integrate with state forces, signaling a loss of independent power and control within the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF). This shift suggests that Baghdad is prioritizing national sovereignty and centralizing authority, allowing Iraq to potentially pivot its economic and political alignment toward the wider Gulf region. The primary implication is that Iran will lose its ability to use Iraq as a stable staging ground for projecting regional power, significantly weakening its broader 'axis of resistance.'
The Rise and Fall of the British Army, 1975–2025
English Summary
The article argues that the British Army has suffered a significant decline since 1975, despite extensive deployments across multiple conflicts (e.g., Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia). This shrinkage, which has reduced the force to half its original size, is attributed to a combination of successive government neglect, funding cuts, and poor strategic decisions made by senior military leadership regarding equipment procurement. Consequently, the current state of the army struggles to meet the demands of an increasingly complex and challenging security environment. Policy efforts must address systemic leadership failures and resource allocation to restore operational capability.
中文摘要
本文論述英國陸軍自1975年以來遭受了顯著衰退，儘管其曾部署於多場衝突（例如伊拉克、阿富汗、波斯尼亞）。這種規模縮減，已使其兵力銳減至原始的一半，歸因於歷次政府的忽視、資金削減，以及高級軍事領導層在裝備採購方面所做出的不當戰略決策。因此，當前陸軍的狀態難以應對日益複雜且充滿挑戰的安全環境。政策層面必須解決系統性的領導失誤和資源分配問題，才能恢復其作戰能力。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Ukraine's success in modern warfare stems not from specific weapons, but from building a resilient ecosystem—including local software, sensors, and mass production capacity—to deploy cheap, abundant unmanned systems. Taiwan is criticized for missing this critical lesson by prioritizing the purchase of expensive traditional platforms over developing its own indigenous technological architecture. For effective deterrence against China, Taiwan must shift its focus from mere procurement to institutional reform, building a localized command-and-control system (analogous to Ukraine's Delta) and mastering distributed, affordable maritime defenses tailored for an island theater.
-
3.
The article argues that traditional concepts of nuclear deterrence are facing a "strange defeat" due to modern asymmetric warfare capabilities. Key evidence is Ukraine’s deep strike operation into Russia, where operatives used remote-launched drones and infiltration tactics to destroy strategic heavy bombers and damage nuclear command and control assets. This successful attack demonstrates the vulnerability of fixed military infrastructure, signaling that large-scale conventional or nuclear doctrines are increasingly obsolete. Policymakers must adjust strategies to account for low-cost, high-impact unconventional attacks rather than relying solely on traditional deterrence models.
-
4.
The article argues that maintaining strict civil control over the military is paramount to the health of the republic, warning that using armed forces for domestic or political issues constitutes dangerous 'mission creep.' Historically, leaders like Washington established this principle by deferring authority to civilian representatives; however, modern times show a public tendency to rely on the military to solve complex national problems. This reliance risks diverting the force from its primary combat mission and undermining democratic institutions. For policy, the implication is that national strength depends not on military capability alone, but on citizens actively engaging in political life and local communities, thereby strengthening civilian governance.
-
5.
The article posits that the United States must embrace a 'New Americanism,' signaling a fundamental shift in how Washington defines its national identity and global role. It argues that current geopolitical pressures—such as rising multipolarity and shifting alliances—require a re-evaluation of traditional, unilateral foreign policy doctrines. Strategically, this necessitates moving beyond purely transactional diplomacy toward a more integrated approach that balances domestic social cohesion with renewed international partnerships to maintain influence in key theaters.