The analysis argues that Iran's long-standing political and military influence in Iraq is rapidly diminishing due to internal shifts and growing Iraqi resentment over foreign interference. Key evidence includes prominent Iranian-backed militias beginning to disarm or integrate with state forces, signaling a loss of independent power and control within the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF). This shift suggests that Baghdad is prioritizing national sovereignty and centralizing authority, allowing Iraq to potentially pivot its economic and political alignment toward the wider Gulf region. The primary implication is that Iran will lose its ability to use Iraq as a stable staging ground for projecting regional power, significantly weakening its broader 'axis of resistance.'
The Curse of Middle-Sized Wars
English Summary
The article posits that democratic nations are structurally optimized for two extremes of conflict: small, professional 'little wars' or massive, total wars requiring full societal mobilization. The core finding is that democracies face a unique strategic vulnerability when confronted with 'middle-sized wars.' These conflicts are sufficiently destructive to cause immense bloodshed but are too limited to necessitate the full commitment of the home front, creating a profound dilemma. This structural mismatch suggests that modern democracies may be poorly equipped to manage conflicts that fall between the spectrum of limited and total warfare, impacting strategic planning and military readiness.
中文摘要
本文提出，民主國家在結構上僅針對兩種極端的衝突類型進行優化：即小型、專業化的「小規模戰爭」，或是需要全面社會動員的大規模「全面戰爭」。核心發現指出，當民主國家面對「中等規模戰爭」時，會面臨一種獨特的戰略弱點。這類衝突的破壞力足以造成巨大傷亡，但其範圍又過於有限，無法觸發動員整個後方的必要性，從而產生了深刻的兩難困境。這種結構性不匹配暗示，現代民主國家可能難以應對介於有限戰爭與全面戰爭之間的衝突，這將對戰略規劃和軍事準備狀態產生影響。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Ukraine's success in modern warfare stems not from specific weapons, but from building a resilient ecosystem—including local software, sensors, and mass production capacity—to deploy cheap, abundant unmanned systems. Taiwan is criticized for missing this critical lesson by prioritizing the purchase of expensive traditional platforms over developing its own indigenous technological architecture. For effective deterrence against China, Taiwan must shift its focus from mere procurement to institutional reform, building a localized command-and-control system (analogous to Ukraine's Delta) and mastering distributed, affordable maritime defenses tailored for an island theater.
-
3.
The article argues that traditional concepts of nuclear deterrence are facing a "strange defeat" due to modern asymmetric warfare capabilities. Key evidence is Ukraine’s deep strike operation into Russia, where operatives used remote-launched drones and infiltration tactics to destroy strategic heavy bombers and damage nuclear command and control assets. This successful attack demonstrates the vulnerability of fixed military infrastructure, signaling that large-scale conventional or nuclear doctrines are increasingly obsolete. Policymakers must adjust strategies to account for low-cost, high-impact unconventional attacks rather than relying solely on traditional deterrence models.
-
4.
The article argues that maintaining strict civil control over the military is paramount to the health of the republic, warning that using armed forces for domestic or political issues constitutes dangerous 'mission creep.' Historically, leaders like Washington established this principle by deferring authority to civilian representatives; however, modern times show a public tendency to rely on the military to solve complex national problems. This reliance risks diverting the force from its primary combat mission and undermining democratic institutions. For policy, the implication is that national strength depends not on military capability alone, but on citizens actively engaging in political life and local communities, thereby strengthening civilian governance.
-
5.
The article posits that the United States must embrace a 'New Americanism,' signaling a fundamental shift in how Washington defines its national identity and global role. It argues that current geopolitical pressures—such as rising multipolarity and shifting alliances—require a re-evaluation of traditional, unilateral foreign policy doctrines. Strategically, this necessitates moving beyond purely transactional diplomacy toward a more integrated approach that balances domestic social cohesion with renewed international partnerships to maintain influence in key theaters.