The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
The Palimpsest Constitution: The Social Life of Constitutions in Myanmar
English Summary
The article argues that Myanmar possesses a "palimpsest constitution," meaning that its political landscape is shaped not by a single document, but by the persistent, layered memory of multiple historical legal codes. Key evidence includes the selective invocation of documents ranging from the British colonial laws and the 1935 Act to the 1959 and 2008 constitutions by both military leaders and political opposition. The central finding is that constitutional discourse is not a guarantee of democracy, but rather a flexible tool that can be utilized by all political actors—even authoritarian ones—to legitimize their claims and sustain repression. For policy, this suggests that external engagement must recognize the deep, contradictory nature of Myanmar's legal culture, understanding that formal constitutional adherence does not equate to genuine democratic governance.
中文摘要
本文論述緬甸擁有一個「羊皮紙憲法」（palimpsest constitution），意指其政治格局並非由單一文件塑造，而是由多個歷史法律法典持續疊加、層層累積的記憶所形塑。關鍵證據包括軍方領導人與政治反對派皆有選擇性地援引文件，範圍涵蓋了從英國殖民地法律、1935年法案，到1959年和2008年憲法等。核心發現是，憲法論述本身並不能保證民主，而更像是一種靈活的工具，可供所有政治行為者——即使是威權政體——利用來合法化其主張並維持壓制。因此，政策建議是，外部參與必須認識到緬甸法律文化深層且矛盾的本質，理解形式上的憲法遵循並不等同於真正的民主治理。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The article analyzes the deep ideological split within the Democratic Party regarding the future of U.S. foreign policy, pitting centrists against progressives. Centrists generally advocate for restoring a reformed U.S.-led international order and strengthening alliances, while progressives argue for a multipolar world that prioritizes transnational threats like climate change and AI over geopolitical competition. This division is most pronounced in the Middle East, where centrists push for greater pressure on Israel and a regional settlement, a shift largely welcomed by progressives. The core finding is that these internal debates threaten to consume a future administration with indecision, making it difficult for the U.S. to project a coherent and unified global strategy.
-
5.
The article argues that the Nordic model of deep, regional military cooperation (minilateralism) provides a crucial blueprint for sustaining NATO's collective defense against escalating Russian threats. This success is evidenced by the Nordic states' transition from cost-saving measures to a unified security imperative, establishing integrated command structures and specialized regional roles. Policy-wise, the report urges NATO to replicate this regionalization approach in other frontline areas, such as the Baltic and Black Seas. Establishing these subregional 'deterrence clusters' would enhance local response capabilities, strengthen the alliance's overall posture, and provide a vital hedge against potential paralysis of the main NATO structure.