The analysis argues that Iran's long-standing political and military influence in Iraq is rapidly diminishing due to internal shifts and growing Iraqi resentment over foreign interference. Key evidence includes prominent Iranian-backed militias beginning to disarm or integrate with state forces, signaling a loss of independent power and control within the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF). This shift suggests that Baghdad is prioritizing national sovereignty and centralizing authority, allowing Iraq to potentially pivot its economic and political alignment toward the wider Gulf region. The primary implication is that Iran will lose its ability to use Iraq as a stable staging ground for projecting regional power, significantly weakening its broader 'axis of resistance.'
The Palimpsest Constitution: The Social Life of Constitutions in Myanmar
English Summary
The article argues that Myanmar possesses a "palimpsest constitution," meaning that its political landscape is shaped not by a single document, but by the persistent, layered memory of multiple historical legal codes. Key evidence includes the selective invocation of documents ranging from the British colonial laws and the 1935 Act to the 1959 and 2008 constitutions by both military leaders and political opposition. The central finding is that constitutional discourse is not a guarantee of democracy, but rather a flexible tool that can be utilized by all political actors—even authoritarian ones—to legitimize their claims and sustain repression. For policy, this suggests that external engagement must recognize the deep, contradictory nature of Myanmar's legal culture, understanding that formal constitutional adherence does not equate to genuine democratic governance.
中文摘要
本文論述緬甸擁有一個「羊皮紙憲法」（palimpsest constitution），意指其政治格局並非由單一文件塑造，而是由多個歷史法律法典持續疊加、層層累積的記憶所形塑。關鍵證據包括軍方領導人與政治反對派皆有選擇性地援引文件，範圍涵蓋了從英國殖民地法律、1935年法案，到1959年和2008年憲法等。核心發現是，憲法論述本身並不能保證民主，而更像是一種靈活的工具，可供所有政治行為者——即使是威權政體——利用來合法化其主張並維持壓制。因此，政策建議是，外部參與必須認識到緬甸法律文化深層且矛盾的本質，理解形式上的憲法遵循並不等同於真正的民主治理。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Ukraine's success in modern warfare stems not from specific weapons, but from building a resilient ecosystem—including local software, sensors, and mass production capacity—to deploy cheap, abundant unmanned systems. Taiwan is criticized for missing this critical lesson by prioritizing the purchase of expensive traditional platforms over developing its own indigenous technological architecture. For effective deterrence against China, Taiwan must shift its focus from mere procurement to institutional reform, building a localized command-and-control system (analogous to Ukraine's Delta) and mastering distributed, affordable maritime defenses tailored for an island theater.
-
3.
The article argues that traditional concepts of nuclear deterrence are facing a "strange defeat" due to modern asymmetric warfare capabilities. Key evidence is Ukraine’s deep strike operation into Russia, where operatives used remote-launched drones and infiltration tactics to destroy strategic heavy bombers and damage nuclear command and control assets. This successful attack demonstrates the vulnerability of fixed military infrastructure, signaling that large-scale conventional or nuclear doctrines are increasingly obsolete. Policymakers must adjust strategies to account for low-cost, high-impact unconventional attacks rather than relying solely on traditional deterrence models.
-
4.
The article argues that maintaining strict civil control over the military is paramount to the health of the republic, warning that using armed forces for domestic or political issues constitutes dangerous 'mission creep.' Historically, leaders like Washington established this principle by deferring authority to civilian representatives; however, modern times show a public tendency to rely on the military to solve complex national problems. This reliance risks diverting the force from its primary combat mission and undermining democratic institutions. For policy, the implication is that national strength depends not on military capability alone, but on citizens actively engaging in political life and local communities, thereby strengthening civilian governance.
-
5.
The article posits that the United States must embrace a 'New Americanism,' signaling a fundamental shift in how Washington defines its national identity and global role. It argues that current geopolitical pressures—such as rising multipolarity and shifting alliances—require a re-evaluation of traditional, unilateral foreign policy doctrines. Strategically, this necessitates moving beyond purely transactional diplomacy toward a more integrated approach that balances domestic social cohesion with renewed international partnerships to maintain influence in key theaters.