The analysis argues that Iran's long-standing political and military influence in Iraq is rapidly diminishing due to internal shifts and growing Iraqi resentment over foreign interference. Key evidence includes prominent Iranian-backed militias beginning to disarm or integrate with state forces, signaling a loss of independent power and control within the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF). This shift suggests that Baghdad is prioritizing national sovereignty and centralizing authority, allowing Iraq to potentially pivot its economic and political alignment toward the wider Gulf region. The primary implication is that Iran will lose its ability to use Iraq as a stable staging ground for projecting regional power, significantly weakening its broader 'axis of resistance.'
How North Korea Won
English Summary
The article analyzes the systemic factors contributing to North Korea's resilience and stability, suggesting that its 'victory' lies in its ability to navigate severe external shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Key evidence points to the nation's pre-existing structural vulnerabilities, including profound food insecurity and a dilapidated public health infrastructure, which the regime has managed to withstand. For policy, this implies that traditional measures of external pressure or aid must account for these deep-seated internal weaknesses. Any strategic planning must recognize that the regime's stability is highly dependent on managing these internal crises while maintaining geopolitical isolation.
中文摘要
本文分析了促成朝鮮半島韌性與穩定性的系統性因素，指出其「勝利」在於應對嚴峻外部衝擊（例如COVID-19疫情）的能力。關鍵證據指向該國既有的結構性弱點，包括深層的糧食不安全和落後的公共衛生基礎設施，而政權仍成功地抵禦了這些危機。從政策層面來看，這意味著傳統的外部壓力或援助措施必須考慮到這些根深蒂固的內部弱點。任何戰略規劃都必須認識到，該政權的穩定性高度依賴於管理這些內部危機，同時維持地緣政治上的孤立狀態。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Ukraine's success in modern warfare stems not from specific weapons, but from building a resilient ecosystem—including local software, sensors, and mass production capacity—to deploy cheap, abundant unmanned systems. Taiwan is criticized for missing this critical lesson by prioritizing the purchase of expensive traditional platforms over developing its own indigenous technological architecture. For effective deterrence against China, Taiwan must shift its focus from mere procurement to institutional reform, building a localized command-and-control system (analogous to Ukraine's Delta) and mastering distributed, affordable maritime defenses tailored for an island theater.
-
3.
The article argues that traditional concepts of nuclear deterrence are facing a "strange defeat" due to modern asymmetric warfare capabilities. Key evidence is Ukraine’s deep strike operation into Russia, where operatives used remote-launched drones and infiltration tactics to destroy strategic heavy bombers and damage nuclear command and control assets. This successful attack demonstrates the vulnerability of fixed military infrastructure, signaling that large-scale conventional or nuclear doctrines are increasingly obsolete. Policymakers must adjust strategies to account for low-cost, high-impact unconventional attacks rather than relying solely on traditional deterrence models.
-
4.
The article argues that maintaining strict civil control over the military is paramount to the health of the republic, warning that using armed forces for domestic or political issues constitutes dangerous 'mission creep.' Historically, leaders like Washington established this principle by deferring authority to civilian representatives; however, modern times show a public tendency to rely on the military to solve complex national problems. This reliance risks diverting the force from its primary combat mission and undermining democratic institutions. For policy, the implication is that national strength depends not on military capability alone, but on citizens actively engaging in political life and local communities, thereby strengthening civilian governance.
-
5.
The article posits that the United States must embrace a 'New Americanism,' signaling a fundamental shift in how Washington defines its national identity and global role. It argues that current geopolitical pressures—such as rising multipolarity and shifting alliances—require a re-evaluation of traditional, unilateral foreign policy doctrines. Strategically, this necessitates moving beyond purely transactional diplomacy toward a more integrated approach that balances domestic social cohesion with renewed international partnerships to maintain influence in key theaters.