The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
The End of the Open Internet
English Summary
The article argues that the era of the open, unregulated internet is ending as liberal democracies — led by Europe — shift from promoting internet freedom as a geopolitical ideal to asserting digital sovereignty and applying offline legal standards to online spaces. This reversal is traced from the optimism of the Arab Spring, when social media was seen as inherently liberalizing, to the current consensus that platforms require regulation to counter disinformation, hate speech, and foreign interference. The implication is a fragmenting global internet governance landscape, where even democracies now pursue regulatory frameworks that constrain platform behavior, potentially narrowing the ideological gap with authoritarian models of internet control and complicating transatlantic tech policy coordination.
中文摘要
本文主張開放、不受管制的網際網路時代正在終結，以歐洲為首的自由民主國家正從將網路自由視為地緣政治理想，轉向主張數位主權並將線下法律標準適用於網路空間。這一轉變可追溯自阿拉伯之春時期的樂觀氛圍——當時社群媒體被視為天然具有自由化效果——到當前各方已形成共識，認為平台需要監管以應對假訊息、仇恨言論及外國干預。其意涵在於全球網路治理格局日趨碎片化，即便是民主國家現在也在推行約束平台行為的監管框架，這可能縮小與威權網路管控模式之間的意識形態差距，並使跨大西洋科技政策協調更加複雜。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Chatham House analysis concludes that the UK's Defence Investment Plan (DIP) will be viewed by NATO allies as a mixed bag, primarily due to its failure to commit to higher GDP spending targets. However, the plan signals critical strategic improvements by emphasizing novel technologies—such as autonomous systems and digital infrastructure—and enhancing readiness. Crucially, the DIP adopts an international focus through major collaborative programs (e.g., AUKUS, GCAP) and establishes a new National Armaments Director Group (NADG). This structural shift toward flexible, portfolio-based collaboration is strategically valuable for NATO allies seeking reliable partners as US conventional forces reduce their European presence.
-
3.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
4.
The article argues that while Ukraine's deep strikes and Russia's mounting economic instability create a window for peace talks, President Putin remains committed to maximalist demands and may escalate conflict through increased air assaults. Key evidence supporting this tension includes the strain on Russian energy infrastructure versus Moscow's refusal to negotiate in good faith, preferring instead to expand its claims. Consequently, the immediate strategic implication is that Washington must lead intensive diplomacy—a 'shuttle diplomacy'—to establish a framework agreement centered on a ceasefire along current lines and defining long-term European security arrangements.
-
5.
Myanmar has collapsed into Asia’s deadliest conflict, marked by massive economic collapse, widespread famine, and extreme brutality from the military junta. Despite this catastrophic humanitarian crisis, international actors—including major powers and regional blocs like ASEAN—are largely ignoring or withdrawing support for democratic forces. This neglect allows the junta to consolidate power, receiving critical military aid from authoritarian allies such as Russia and Belarus. Policy implications suggest that global indifference is enabling a failed state environment, making Myanmar a highly volatile flashpoint whose instability threatens broader Indo-Pacific security.