The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
NASA Changes Course on Commercial Space Stations
English Summary
NASA's revised strategy for commercial Low Earth Orbit (LEO) stations is criticized for introducing instability by changing requirements and undermining existing private sector investments. The analysis argues that the core problem is not a lack of market demand, but rather the chronic inconsistency and insufficient funding provided by NASA and Congress. For policy, the report advises that NASA should abandon drastic plan changes and instead maintain the 'as-a-service' model by providing sustained, clear funding to current commercial partners. This consistent support is crucial to minimize the technical and operational gap between the ISS retirement and the establishment of a permanent successor station.
中文摘要
針對美國國家航空暨太空總署（NASA）修訂的商業低地球軌道（LEO）站策略，批評指出其透過變動要求和削弱現有私營部門投資，引入了不穩定性。本分析認為，核心問題並非市場需求不足，而是NASA和國會方面提供的資金支持存在慢性不一致性和不足。因此，報告建議在政策層面，NASA應放棄激進的計畫變動，轉而透過為現有商業合作夥伴提供持續且明確的資金支持，維持「服務化」（as-a-service）模式。這種穩定支持對於最小化國際太空站（ISS）退役與建立永久後繼站之間的技術和營運鴻溝至關重要。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.