The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
Don’t Let the USMCA Drift Away
English Summary
The primary finding is that the greatest threat to North American competitiveness is not the withdrawal of USMCA, but the economic uncertainty caused by its protracted review process. The agreement is crucial because it underpins a deeply integrated 'coproduction' system where supply chains run across U.S., Mexican, and Canadian borders. Policy efforts must prioritize an early extension of the pact to prevent investment chilling and maintain predictable preferential trade access, especially as rivals like China expand their manufacturing reach. Failing to address this uncertainty risks slow economic erosion, forfeiting North America’s strongest structural advantage.
中文摘要
主要發現指出，對北美競爭力最大的威脅並非美墨加協定（USMCA）的退出，而是其曠日費時審查過程所引發的經濟不確定性。該協定至關重要，因為它支撐著一個橫跨美國、墨西哥和加拿大邊界的高度整合「共生產」體系。政策制定者必須將優先重點放在及早延長該協定上，以防止投資降溫並維持可預測的優惠貿易便利化，特別是當中國等競爭對手擴大其製造能力時。若未能解決這種不確定性，不僅會導致緩慢的經濟侵蝕，更可能使北美最堅實的結構優勢付諸泡影。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
3.
The roundtable established that implementing generational bans represents a powerful, long-term strategy for tackling deeply entrenched public health crises like tobacco use. Using the UK’s permanent ban on selling cigarettes to those born after 2009 as key evidence, experts analyzed how such policies fundamentally alter market dynamics and consumer behavior over time. These lessons suggest that other nations facing persistent addiction challenges should consider adopting similar age-gating or generational restrictions to accelerate decline and set a precedent for future public health policy interventions.
-
4.
The CSIS analysis finds that the U.S. grid's regulatory framework for connecting large loads is severely fragmented and unprepared for the massive electricity demands posed by AI data centers. FERC has mandated significant reforms across six regional operators, requiring them to modernize interconnection studies, prevent cost-shifting, and establish clear tariffs for co-located generation. Evidence shows that most operators fall far short of these new standards, necessitating complex, multi-year policy adjustments rather than simple compliance. Policymakers must coordinate federal regulation (FERC) with state utilities to accelerate grid modernization, ensuring energy affordability while maintaining technological competitiveness.
-
5.
The Brookings report argues that while modern economies are fundamentally regional in nature, effective governance requires states to align their authority and resources with empowered local cross-sector networks. Current state economic development systems are often fragmented and ill-equipped to manage structural shifts like AI or the energy transition. To modernize, policymakers must adopt a structured 'state-regional' model where states define strategic clusters and allocate capital, while regions coordinate execution using deep local knowledge. This approach has proven successful in catalyzing billions in private investment by ensuring state resources are deployed strategically across multiple sectors to achieve measurable economic growth.