The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
Russian Blood and Treasure: The Ballooning Costs of Putin’s War
English Summary
CSIS concludes that Russia has lost the military initiative in Ukraine, facing mounting costs that are proving strategically unsustainable for Moscow. Evidence points to massive Russian casualties (1.4 million total) and a stalled ground offensive, coupled with significant net territorial losses throughout 2026. Critically, Ukraine has successfully escalated its campaign using AI-enabled long-range strikes against deep Russian infrastructure, including energy and industrial targets near major cities. These mounting military failures and domestic strains suggest that continued international support for Ukrainian defense is crucial to degrading Russia's war capacity.
中文摘要
戰略與國際問題研究所（CSIS）總結指出，俄羅斯在烏克蘭已失去軍事主動權，面臨的成本日益累積，對莫斯科而言已證明具有戰略不可持續性。證據顯示，俄方遭受了大規模傷亡（總計140萬人），地面攻勢停滯不前，加上2026年內顯著的領土損失。至關重要的是，烏克蘭成功地利用AI輔助的遠程打擊戰，升級了其作戰行動，針對俄羅斯深層基礎設施（包括靠近主要城市的能源和工業目標）發動攻擊。這些不斷累積的軍事失敗和國內壓力表明，持續獲得國際對烏克蘭防禦的支持，對於削弱俄羅斯的戰爭能力至關重要。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Chatham House analysis concludes that the UK's Defence Investment Plan (DIP) will be viewed by NATO allies as a mixed bag, primarily due to its failure to commit to higher GDP spending targets. However, the plan signals critical strategic improvements by emphasizing novel technologies—such as autonomous systems and digital infrastructure—and enhancing readiness. Crucially, the DIP adopts an international focus through major collaborative programs (e.g., AUKUS, GCAP) and establishes a new National Armaments Director Group (NADG). This structural shift toward flexible, portfolio-based collaboration is strategically valuable for NATO allies seeking reliable partners as US conventional forces reduce their European presence.
-
3.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
4.
The roundtable established that implementing generational bans represents a powerful, long-term strategy for tackling deeply entrenched public health crises like tobacco use. Using the UK’s permanent ban on selling cigarettes to those born after 2009 as key evidence, experts analyzed how such policies fundamentally alter market dynamics and consumer behavior over time. These lessons suggest that other nations facing persistent addiction challenges should consider adopting similar age-gating or generational restrictions to accelerate decline and set a precedent for future public health policy interventions.
-
5.
The CSIS analysis finds that the U.S. grid's regulatory framework for connecting large loads is severely fragmented and unprepared for the massive electricity demands posed by AI data centers. FERC has mandated significant reforms across six regional operators, requiring them to modernize interconnection studies, prevent cost-shifting, and establish clear tariffs for co-located generation. Evidence shows that most operators fall far short of these new standards, necessitating complex, multi-year policy adjustments rather than simple compliance. Policymakers must coordinate federal regulation (FERC) with state utilities to accelerate grid modernization, ensuring energy affordability while maintaining technological competitiveness.