The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
Global trade imbalances have changed since the 2008 financial crisis. Now they reflect new risks
English Summary
This Chatham House analysis argues that global trade imbalances have fundamentally shifted since the 2008 financial crisis, moving beyond debt-fueled consumer excess to reflect new geopolitical and competitive risks. Evidence shows a narrowing US deficit alongside a rising Chinese surplus, driven by shifts in energy production and China’s ascendancy in global manufacturing. The primary risks now center on intensifying competition from Chinese firms, particularly impacting European industries like automotive and machinery, alongside the broader geopolitical implications of China’s economic dominance. Policy strategies must adapt to address these evolving imbalances, considering exchange rate adjustments and fostering industrial resilience.
中文摘要
本報告由智庫撰寫，認為自2008年金融危機以來，全球貿易失衡格局發生了根本性轉變，已不再僅僅是基於債務推動的消費者浪潮，而是反映了新的地緣政治和競爭風險。 數據顯示，美國赤字正在收窄，而中國的盈餘正在增加，這主要受到能源生產轉型以及中國在全球製造業崛起帶來的影響。 目前的主要風險集中在中國企業的日益激烈的競爭，特別對歐洲的汽車和機械產業產生影響，以及中國經濟主導地位所帶來的更廣泛的地緣政治影響。 政策應當適應這些不斷演變的失衡，考慮到匯率調整以及促進產業韌性。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Chatham House analysis concludes that the UK's Defence Investment Plan (DIP) will be viewed by NATO allies as a mixed bag, primarily due to its failure to commit to higher GDP spending targets. However, the plan signals critical strategic improvements by emphasizing novel technologies—such as autonomous systems and digital infrastructure—and enhancing readiness. Crucially, the DIP adopts an international focus through major collaborative programs (e.g., AUKUS, GCAP) and establishes a new National Armaments Director Group (NADG). This structural shift toward flexible, portfolio-based collaboration is strategically valuable for NATO allies seeking reliable partners as US conventional forces reduce their European presence.
-
3.
The CSIS analysis finds that the U.S. grid's regulatory framework for connecting large loads is severely fragmented and unprepared for the massive electricity demands posed by AI data centers. FERC has mandated significant reforms across six regional operators, requiring them to modernize interconnection studies, prevent cost-shifting, and establish clear tariffs for co-located generation. Evidence shows that most operators fall far short of these new standards, necessitating complex, multi-year policy adjustments rather than simple compliance. Policymakers must coordinate federal regulation (FERC) with state utilities to accelerate grid modernization, ensuring energy affordability while maintaining technological competitiveness.
-
4.
The article argues that while Ukraine's deep strikes and Russia's mounting economic instability create a window for peace talks, President Putin remains committed to maximalist demands and may escalate conflict through increased air assaults. Key evidence supporting this tension includes the strain on Russian energy infrastructure versus Moscow's refusal to negotiate in good faith, preferring instead to expand its claims. Consequently, the immediate strategic implication is that Washington must lead intensive diplomacy—a 'shuttle diplomacy'—to establish a framework agreement centered on a ceasefire along current lines and defining long-term European security arrangements.
-
5.
Russia utilizes long-range missile and drone strikes as a sophisticated coercive strategy, concentrating attacks on critical geographical nodes—including energy grids, ports, industrial centers, and major urban areas—to impose cumulative costs. This campaign aims to degrade Ukraine's logistics, strain its infrastructure, and apply sustained psychological pressure rather than achieving rapid military victory. The analysis suggests that modern coercion leverages civilian vulnerability and systemic damage as primary tools of geopolitical leverage, weakening the adversary’s ability to govern or sustain resistance. Policymakers must recognize this shift toward using economic and infrastructural attrition to achieve strategic political outcomes.