The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Despite reset in India–US relations, New Delhi retains commitment to strategic hedging
English Summary
Chatham House argues that the February 6 India-US tariff deal marks only a partial reset, while New Delhi continues its long-standing strategy of hedging rather than aligning fully with Washington. Although US tariffs on India reportedly fell from 50% to 18% in exchange for major Indian purchase commitments and a pledge to stop Russian oil imports, implementation remains ambiguous because Indian state refiners still buy Russian crude and enforcement details are unclear. The article also notes political and economic constraints on both sides, including India’s sensitivity over agriculture, uncertainty over alternative oil supply, and persistent risk that the US could reimpose tariffs. Strategically, India is likely to keep diversifying trade, energy, and defense ties across multiple partners, implying a more transactional India-US relationship with limited US leverage over India’s broader foreign-policy autonomy.
中文摘要
研究認為，2月6日的印美關稅協議僅屬部分重啟；新德里仍延續其長期「避險平衡」而非與華盛頓全面對齊的策略。儘管據報美國對印度關稅由50%降至18%，交換條件是印度作出大額採購承諾並承諾停止進口俄羅斯石油，但執行面仍不明朗，因為印度國營煉油商仍在購買俄羅斯原油，且執法細節不清。文章亦指出雙方都面臨政治與經濟限制，包括印度對農業議題的敏感性、替代油源供應的不確定性，以及美國可能重新加徵關稅的持續風險。從戰略層面看，印度可能持續在多個夥伴間分散其貿易、能源與國防關係，意味著印美關係將更具交易性，而美國對印度更廣泛外交政策自主性的影響力有限。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
5.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.