The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Nigeria and Ghana foreign ministers discuss security, AES countries, Boko Haram and US operations
English Summary
West African foreign ministers emphasize that regional security and peacebuilding must be driven by locally-led solutions, citing the historical success of ECOMOG as a preferred model over direct foreign military intervention. They argue that regional violence is driven by a complex interplay of youth unemployment, climate change, and state collapse rather than purely religious motivations, necessitating a more nuanced international perspective. Consequently, they call for a supportive rather than direct role for the United States and a reset of relations with France. Furthermore, the ministers warn that the international community must take greater responsibility for African stability to prevent the region from becoming a safe haven for terrorist cells displaced from other global conflicts.
中文摘要
西非各國外長強調，區域安全與和平建設必須由當地主導的方案驅動，並援引西非監測組（ECOMOG）的歷史成就，主張其應作為優於外國直接軍事干預的首選模式。外長們指出，區域暴力源於青年失業、氣候變遷與國家崩潰等因素的複雜交織，而非純粹的宗教動機，因此國際社會需要更具細緻感的觀察視角。基於此，他們呼籲美國扮演支持性而非主導性的角色，並主張重啟與法國的關係。此外，外長們警告，國際社會必須對非洲穩定承擔更大責任，以防該地區成為全球其他衝突地區流散恐怖組織的避風港。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.