The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
South Asia’s Gen Z revolutions now face difficult realities
English Summary
Youth-led protest movements that toppled governments in Sri Lanka (2022), Bangladesh (2024), and Nepal (2025) have produced new administrations with strong mandates but mounting governance challenges. All three countries face economic strain from IMF bailouts compounded by the Iran war's inflationary pressures and fuel shortages, while inexperienced leaders are struggling to deliver on anti-corruption and reform promises. Relations with India present both opportunities—particularly in energy and humanitarian aid—and risks from border tensions and identity politics under the BJP's expanding regional footprint. The convergence of internal fragility and external shocks means these post-revolutionary governments could squander their democratic renewal windows if structural reforms stall.
中文摘要
青年主導的抗議運動先後推翻了斯里蘭卡（2022年）、孟加拉（2024年）及尼泊爾（2025年）的政府，催生了擁有強大民意授權但面臨日益嚴峻治理挑戰的新政權。三國均承受國際貨幣基金組織紓困方案帶來的經濟壓力，加上伊朗戰爭引發的通膨壓力與燃料短缺，使局勢雪上加霜；與此同時，缺乏經驗的領導人正艱難地兌現反腐與改革承諾。與印度的關係既帶來機遇——特別是在能源與人道援助領域——也因邊境緊張局勢及印度人民黨擴大區域影響力下的身分政治而存在風險。內部脆弱性與外部衝擊的交匯意味著，若結構性改革停滯不前，這些後革命政府可能將錯失民主更新的窗口期。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.
-
5.
The article analyzes the deep ideological split within the Democratic Party regarding the future of U.S. foreign policy, pitting centrists against progressives. Centrists generally advocate for restoring a reformed U.S.-led international order and strengthening alliances, while progressives argue for a multipolar world that prioritizes transnational threats like climate change and AI over geopolitical competition. This division is most pronounced in the Middle East, where centrists push for greater pressure on Israel and a regional settlement, a shift largely welcomed by progressives. The core finding is that these internal debates threaten to consume a future administration with indecision, making it difficult for the U.S. to project a coherent and unified global strategy.