The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
The UK can’t break off critical mineral links with China. But it can understand its vulnerabilities
English Summary
The UK cannot afford a total decoupling from China's critical mineral supply chains, as the economy relies heavily on China for market access and financing, particularly in the private mining sector. Rather than pursuing separation, the UK must adopt a nuanced strategy that acknowledges genuine vulnerabilities while maintaining constructive engagement. Policy recommendations center on mitigating risk through clear guidelines, such as limiting Chinese influence on the corporate governance of UK-listed mining firms and establishing robust protections for commercially sensitive data in shared infrastructure. This approach allows the UK to manage geopolitical risks without sacrificing vital economic ties.
中文摘要
英國無法承受與中國關鍵礦物供應鏈完全脫鉤的風險，因為其經濟在市場准入和融資方面，特別是在私營採礦部門，高度依賴中國。因此，英國不應追求分離，而必須採取一種細膩的策略：在承認實際的脆弱性的同時，維持建設性的參與。政策建議的核心是透過明確的指導方針來減輕風險，例如限制中國對在英國上市的礦業公司公司治理的影響，並為共享基礎設施中的商業敏感數據建立強健的保護機制。這種方法使英國能夠在不犧牲關鍵經濟聯繫的前提下，管理地緣政治風險。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.