The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
Navigating a changing global order: Ghana’s strategic priorities
English Summary
Ghana is strategically positioning itself as a key actor in the fragmenting, multipolar global order by adopting a policy of 'multi-alignment.' The nation is deepening its regional influence by promoting West African security cooperation and hosting the AfCFTA Secretariat, while simultaneously championing global justice and inclusive multilateralism. This strategy involves initiatives like the Accra Reset and leading UN efforts to recognize the transatlantic slave trade as a crime against humanity. For policy makers, Ghana's approach suggests that African states are actively leveraging non-alignment to promote continental agency and contribute to a more balanced international governance system.
中文摘要
迦納正透過採納「多重定位」（multi-alignment）政策，策略性地將自身定位為碎片化、多極化全球秩序中的關鍵參與者。該國透過推動西非安全合作並承辦非洲大陸自由貿易區（AfCFTA）秘書處，深化其區域影響力；同時，它也積極倡導全球正義與包容性的多邊主義。此策略體現於「阿克拉重啟」（Accra Reset）等倡議，以及主導聯合國努力將跨大西洋奴隸貿易定性為危害人類罪行。對於政策制定者而言，迦納的做法顯示，非洲國家正積極利用不結盟的立場，以提升大陸的主體能動性，並為建立更平衡的國際治理體系做出貢獻。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.
-
5.
The article analyzes the deep ideological split within the Democratic Party regarding the future of U.S. foreign policy, pitting centrists against progressives. Centrists generally advocate for restoring a reformed U.S.-led international order and strengthening alliances, while progressives argue for a multipolar world that prioritizes transnational threats like climate change and AI over geopolitical competition. This division is most pronounced in the Middle East, where centrists push for greater pressure on Israel and a regional settlement, a shift largely welcomed by progressives. The core finding is that these internal debates threaten to consume a future administration with indecision, making it difficult for the U.S. to project a coherent and unified global strategy.