The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
‘Happy vassal’ or ‘strategic hedging’? Europe’s hard choices as NATO crumbles
English Summary
The article argues that the post-war transatlantic security order provided by the US is dissolving, rendering Europe’s reliance on NATO increasingly precarious due to American transactional behavior. Key evidence includes recent US threats regarding territorial claims (like Greenland) and military maneuvers, which demonstrate a willingness to treat alliances as negotiable assets rather than shared values. Consequently, achieving genuine European security autonomy requires moving beyond mere defense spending; the strategy must focus on building three interconnected pillars: industrial self-sufficiency, technological sovereignty (e.g., independent satellite constellations), and energy decoupling from US markets.
中文摘要
本文指出，美國所提供的戰後跨大西洋安全秩序正在瓦解，由於美國的交易性行為（transactional behavior），歐洲對北約（NATO）的依賴日益岌岌可危。關鍵證據包括近期美國關於領土主張（如格陵蘭）和軍事演習所發出的威脅，這些都表明了將聯盟視為可協商資產而非共同價值觀的意願。因此，要實現真正的歐洲安全自主性，不能僅止於增加國防開支；戰略必須著重建立三大相互關聯的支柱：工業自給自足、技術主權（例如獨立衛星星座），以及能源脫鉤美國市場。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Chatham House analysis concludes that the UK's Defence Investment Plan (DIP) will be viewed by NATO allies as a mixed bag, primarily due to its failure to commit to higher GDP spending targets. However, the plan signals critical strategic improvements by emphasizing novel technologies—such as autonomous systems and digital infrastructure—and enhancing readiness. Crucially, the DIP adopts an international focus through major collaborative programs (e.g., AUKUS, GCAP) and establishes a new National Armaments Director Group (NADG). This structural shift toward flexible, portfolio-based collaboration is strategically valuable for NATO allies seeking reliable partners as US conventional forces reduce their European presence.
-
3.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
4.
The roundtable established that implementing generational bans represents a powerful, long-term strategy for tackling deeply entrenched public health crises like tobacco use. Using the UK’s permanent ban on selling cigarettes to those born after 2009 as key evidence, experts analyzed how such policies fundamentally alter market dynamics and consumer behavior over time. These lessons suggest that other nations facing persistent addiction challenges should consider adopting similar age-gating or generational restrictions to accelerate decline and set a precedent for future public health policy interventions.
-
5.
The CSIS analysis finds that the U.S. grid's regulatory framework for connecting large loads is severely fragmented and unprepared for the massive electricity demands posed by AI data centers. FERC has mandated significant reforms across six regional operators, requiring them to modernize interconnection studies, prevent cost-shifting, and establish clear tariffs for co-located generation. Evidence shows that most operators fall far short of these new standards, necessitating complex, multi-year policy adjustments rather than simple compliance. Policymakers must coordinate federal regulation (FERC) with state utilities to accelerate grid modernization, ensuring energy affordability while maintaining technological competitiveness.