The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
The FCAS fighter jet looks like it’s dead. Could that be a good thing?
English Summary
The FCAS fighter jet program is effectively collapsing as Germany seeks to withdraw, primarily due to France and Germany's incompatible requirements—France needs carrier and nuclear capabilities while Germany seeks a conventional fighter. This failure reflects broader European defense fragmentation, with four competing next-generation fighter programs underway, which threatens to splinter resources and leave Europe dangerously dependent on an unreliable US F-35 supply through the 2040s. However, this impasse could prove beneficial if it prompts European states to abandon the outdated procurement model driven by industrial prestige and export competition, instead consolidating resources into a single, unified fighter system focused on urgent strategic needs.
中文摘要
FCAS戰鬥機計畫正實質崩潰，主要原因是法國和德國之間需求的不相容——法國要求搭載航空母艦和核武能力，而德國則只尋求一款傳統戰鬥機。此失敗反映了歐洲更廣泛的防衛碎片化現象，目前有四個競爭的下一代戰鬥機計畫正在進行，這威脅到分散資源，並可能使歐洲在2040年代持續依賴不可靠的美國F-35供應。然而，這種僵局若能促使歐洲國家放棄受產業聲望和出口競爭驅動的過時採購模式，轉而將資源集中於一個單一、統一的戰鬥機系統，專注於迫切的戰略需求，則可能帶來益處。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.