The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
Iran's protests: Will this time be different?
English Summary
Chatham House argues that the late-2025 protest wave in Iran is more structurally consequential than episodic unrest because economic collapse has fused with broader political grievances and demands for systemic change. The event framing highlights sustained nationwide mobilization despite repression, internet blackouts, and security crackdowns, suggesting deeper legitimacy erosion rather than short-term discontent. It also points to protest demographics and persistence as key indicators that the Islamic Republic’s coercive tools may restore control only temporarily. For policymakers, this implies planning for prolonged instability in Iran, calibrating external pressure and messaging carefully, and assessing second-order regional effects involving US and Israeli strategy.
中文摘要
查塔姆研究所（Chatham House）主張，伊朗在2025年末爆發的抗議浪潮，相較於間歇性動亂，具有更深層的結構性後果，因為經濟崩潰已與更廣泛的政治不滿及體制性變革訴求相互融合。事件框架強調，即使面臨鎮壓、網路斷線與安全部門強力清剿，全國性動員仍持續，顯示這更可能是政權正當性更深層侵蝕，而非短期不滿。該分析亦指出，抗議者的人口結構與持續性是關鍵指標，顯示伊斯蘭共和國的強制工具即使能恢復控制，也可能僅屬暫時。對政策制定者而言，這意味著需為伊朗長期不穩定預作規劃，審慎校準外部施壓與訊息傳遞，並評估牽涉美國與以色列戰略的第二層區域效應。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Chatham House analysis concludes that the UK's Defence Investment Plan (DIP) will be viewed by NATO allies as a mixed bag, primarily due to its failure to commit to higher GDP spending targets. However, the plan signals critical strategic improvements by emphasizing novel technologies—such as autonomous systems and digital infrastructure—and enhancing readiness. Crucially, the DIP adopts an international focus through major collaborative programs (e.g., AUKUS, GCAP) and establishes a new National Armaments Director Group (NADG). This structural shift toward flexible, portfolio-based collaboration is strategically valuable for NATO allies seeking reliable partners as US conventional forces reduce their European presence.
-
3.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
4.
The roundtable established that implementing generational bans represents a powerful, long-term strategy for tackling deeply entrenched public health crises like tobacco use. Using the UK’s permanent ban on selling cigarettes to those born after 2009 as key evidence, experts analyzed how such policies fundamentally alter market dynamics and consumer behavior over time. These lessons suggest that other nations facing persistent addiction challenges should consider adopting similar age-gating or generational restrictions to accelerate decline and set a precedent for future public health policy interventions.
-
5.
The CSIS analysis finds that the U.S. grid's regulatory framework for connecting large loads is severely fragmented and unprepared for the massive electricity demands posed by AI data centers. FERC has mandated significant reforms across six regional operators, requiring them to modernize interconnection studies, prevent cost-shifting, and establish clear tariffs for co-located generation. Evidence shows that most operators fall far short of these new standards, necessitating complex, multi-year policy adjustments rather than simple compliance. Policymakers must coordinate federal regulation (FERC) with state utilities to accelerate grid modernization, ensuring energy affordability while maintaining technological competitiveness.