ThinkTankWeekly

Africa Aware: Rebuilding regional order and security in West Africa

Chatham House | 2026-03-28 | africa

Topics: Africa

Visit original source

ThinkTankWeekly provides a curated entry and summary only. Full text and PDF remain on the publisher's website.

English Summary

The withdrawal of Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger from ECOWAS and formation of the Alliance of Sahel States has fractured regional security cooperation at a critical moment, as the Sahel faces the world's highest terrorism burden according to the Global Terrorism Index. Essential security mechanisms have stalled on key cooperation issues including joint military operations, intelligence sharing, hot pursuit rights, and tackling illicit finance. Ghana and Nigeria's foreign ministers are advocating for localized security solutions adapted to the new regional configuration, suggesting West African security strategies must now function within a fragmented institutional landscape rather than traditional ECOWAS frameworks.

中文摘要

布基納法索、馬里和尼日爾退出西非經濟共同體並成立薩赫爾國家聯盟,在薩赫爾地區面臨全球最高恐怖主義威脅的關鍵時刻,這一舉動將區域安全合作分裂開來。根據全球恐怖主義指數,該地區面臨全球最嚴重的恐怖主義負擔。聯合軍事行動、情報共享、越境追擊權和打擊非法金融等關鍵安全合作機制已陷入停滯。加納和尼日利亞的外交部長正在提倡適應新區域格局的本地化安全解決方案,這表明西非安全戰略今後必須在碎片化的制度框架內運作,而非依賴傳統的西非經濟共同體框架。

Related Entries

  1. 1.
    2026-10-30 | middle_east | 2026-W44

    The Chatham House analysis argues that Israel's current political deadlock stems from deep ideological divisions, which severely threaten national stability and governance capacity. Key evidence points to the inability of major political blocs to form a cohesive government, leading to policy paralysis and internal friction. Strategically, the report implies that external actors, including regional powers and global allies, must adjust their engagement models, recognizing that internal instability makes long-term policy predictability challenging. Continued fragmentation necessitates a shift toward supporting internal reconciliation mechanisms rather than focusing solely on external security cooperation.

    Read at Chatham House

  2. 2.
    2026-10-29 | europe | 2026-W44

    The Chatham House analysis argues that the EU's aggressive industrial policy, encapsulated by its 'Made in Europe' initiatives, is creating significant geopolitical pressure on the UK. This policy framework forces London to make a critical strategic choice: either deepen its alignment with EU standards and regulatory blocs or pivot toward closer economic and technological ties with Beijing. Failure to define a clear path risks the UK being marginalized by the EU's self-sufficient economic sphere, necessitating an urgent reevaluation of its foreign and trade policy to maintain global relevance.

    Read at Chatham House

  3. 3.
    2026-10-29 | africa | 2026-W44

    The Chatham House analysis details the protracted nature of Cameroon's Anglophone Crisis, arguing that the conflict is fundamentally rooted in historical linguistic and cultural marginalization rather than simple separatist aims. Key evidence points to the failure of centralized state institutions to integrate the region's unique identity and governance needs. Policy implications stress that long-term stability requires a shift from military solutions toward comprehensive diplomatic frameworks that promote genuine decentralization and political inclusion across the Anglophone regions.

    Read at Chatham House

  4. 4.
    2026-10-29 | europe | 2026-W44

    The article analyzes the complex relationship between Britain and the EU in the context of developing 'sovereign AI.' It argues that while geopolitical differences create competitive pressures, the necessity of establishing joint standards for AI governance mandates a strategic pivot toward collaboration. Key evidence centers on the divergence between the EU's comprehensive regulatory approach and the UK's more agile, market-driven model. Policymakers must therefore prioritize structured cooperation to prevent technological fragmentation and secure mutual market access in the rapidly evolving AI landscape.

    Read at Chatham House

  5. 5.
    2026-10-28 | middle_east | 2026-W44

    The Chatham House analysis argues that deep political divisions among Iraq's major Kurdish parties pose a significant threat to the Kurdistan Region's long-term autonomy and stability. These internal fractures weaken the region's collective negotiating power with Baghdad and regional rivals, making it vulnerable to external interference and political instability. For policy makers, the findings suggest that international partners must prioritize mediating political reconciliation among the factions. Strategic efforts are needed to support unified governance and strengthen regional institutions to safeguard the Kurdistan Region's self-determination and stability.

    Read at Chatham House