The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Why demining the Strait of Hormuz will be difficult – but also presents an opportunity
English Summary
While reopening the Strait of Hormuz is critical for global shipping, clearing the estimated 80 mines will be an extremely difficult and complex technical challenge due to advanced mine types and current traffic congestion. Successful demining requires sustained international cooperation among major powers (including the US, UK, and EU) because no single nation possesses the necessary resources or trust to complete the task alone. Strategically, Iran's participation in clearing the mines offers a vital opportunity for Tehran to demonstrate commitment to de-escalation. Ultimately, the article argues that technical success hinges on achieving a sustained political solution: all parties must commit to an extended cessation of hostilities and guarantee safe passage for mine countermeasures.
中文摘要
雖然重新開放霍爾木茲海峽對於全球航運至關重要，但清除預計的 80 枚地雷將是一個極其困難且複雜的技術挑戰，原因在於先進的地雷類型和目前的交通擁堵狀況。成功的排雷工作需要主要大國（包括美國、英國和歐盟）之間持續的國際合作，因為沒有單一國家擁有獨立完成此任務所需的資源或信任度。從戰略角度來看，伊朗參與清除地雷提供了特爾阿方展示其致力於降級升溫的重要機會。最終，本文論點指出，技術上的成功取決於實現一個持久的政治解決方案：所有相關方必須承諾延長停止敵對行動，並確保排雷行動的安全通道。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.