The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Book reviews: The social science behind the CIA and counting Russia’s crimes against nature
English Summary
Recent analyses emphasize that modern conflict requires integrating technological shifts, environmental accountability, and deep historical context into strategic planning. Key findings include how smartphones are fundamentally changing warfare through 'the stack' of global communications, and the necessity of applying international law concepts like 'ecocide' to document war damage (e.g., in Ukraine). Furthermore, effective intelligence demands a rigorous social science approach—as demonstrated by the professionalization of CIA analysis—and requires understanding regional powers, such as Iran, on their own strategic terms rather than through caricature. Policy implications mandate that national security strategies must anticipate tech-driven escalation while building analytical frameworks that account for environmental and historical dimensions.
中文摘要
近期分析強調，現代衝突的戰略規劃必須整合技術轉變、環境責任和深層歷史背景。主要發現包括智能手機如何透過全球通訊的「堆疊」（the stack）從根本上改變戰爭形式；以及應用國際法概念如「生態滅絕罪」（ecocide）來記錄戰爭破壞（例如在烏克蘭）。此外，有效的情報工作要求採用嚴謹的社會科學方法——正如中央情報局（CIA）分析專業化所證明的那樣——並且必須從區域強權（例如伊朗）自身的戰略視角去理解，而非依賴刻板印象。政策意涵要求國家安全戰略必須預測技術驅動的升級，同時建立能夠納入環境和歷史維度考量的分析框架。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.