The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Middle East and North Africa Programme
English Summary
Chatham House’s Middle East and North Africa Programme argues that better policy on the region requires grounded, field-based analysis of often overlooked drivers of conflict, governance stress, and state–society change. It supports this approach through a research model combining field data collection, bilingual policy publications, convening with decision-makers across sectors, and direct briefings in MENA, the UK, and the US. The programme’s focus on geopolitical competition, transnational conflict dynamics, political-economic networks, and accountability is presented as the analytical basis for more realistic policy choices. For strategy, the implication is that governments and institutions should rely on locally informed, cross-regional, and cross-sector evidence to design interventions and partnerships that are politically feasible and context-specific.
中文摘要
查塔姆研究所（Chatham House）中東與北非計畫主張，若要制定更有效的區域政策，必須建立在扎根在地、以田野為基礎的分析之上，並重視那些常被忽略、卻驅動衝突、治理壓力與國家－社會變遷的關鍵因素。該計畫透過結合田野資料蒐集、雙語政策出版、與跨部門決策者之間的對話召集，以及在中東與北非、英國與美國的直接簡報，來支持此一研究取徑。其對地緣政治競爭、跨國衝突動態、政治經濟網絡與問責機制的關注，被定位為形成更務實政策選項的分析基礎。就策略層面而言，這意味著各國政府與機構應依賴具在地知識、跨區域與跨部門的證據，來設計在政治上可行且符合具體情境的介入措施與夥伴關係。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The article analyzes the deep ideological split within the Democratic Party regarding the future of U.S. foreign policy, pitting centrists against progressives. Centrists generally advocate for restoring a reformed U.S.-led international order and strengthening alliances, while progressives argue for a multipolar world that prioritizes transnational threats like climate change and AI over geopolitical competition. This division is most pronounced in the Middle East, where centrists push for greater pressure on Israel and a regional settlement, a shift largely welcomed by progressives. The core finding is that these internal debates threaten to consume a future administration with indecision, making it difficult for the U.S. to project a coherent and unified global strategy.
-
5.
The article highlights the critical importance of robust, timely early warning systems for civilian safety amid escalating conflict risks in the Gulf and Levant. While regional governments (e.g., Iran, UAE, Qatar) are investing in advanced mobile alert systems following recent escalations, the failure of such systems, as seen in Saudi Arabia, raises serious concerns. The evidence shows that effective warning mechanisms are becoming crucial for minimizing civilian casualties and injuries during attacks. Policymakers must prioritize the development and implementation of unified, community-based warning infrastructure to enhance resilience and preparedness across the region.