The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
The world’s internet infrastructure is under threat – who is going to protect it?
English Summary
The article argues that global digital infrastructure—including undersea cables and data centers—is critically vulnerable to state attacks, as evidenced by recent disruptions in the Red Sea and Gulf. Because these systems are privately owned and cross international waters, the current legal framework is outdated and fails to assign clear responsibilities for protection or repair during conflict. This vulnerability necessitates a modernized governance approach that treats subsea cables as critical maritime infrastructure requiring stronger international law. Policymakers must therefore focus on establishing coordinated global frameworks, such as those being developed by the EU, to mandate transparency, ensure safe passage, and build resilience against geopolitical threats.
中文摘要
本文論述全球數位基礎設施——包括海底電纜和資料中心——極易遭受國家級攻擊。紅海和灣區近期發生的中斷事件即為佐證。由於這些系統屬於私人所有並橫跨國際水域，現行法律框架已過時，無法在衝突期間明確劃分保護或修復的責任。這種脆弱性要求採用現代化的治理模式，將海底電纜視為關鍵海事基礎設施，並需制定更強力的國際法規。因此，政策制定者必須著重建立協調性的全球框架（例如歐盟正在開發的機制），以強制實施透明度、確保安全通行權，並增強抵禦地緣政治威脅的韌性。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Chatham House analysis concludes that the UK's Defence Investment Plan (DIP) will be viewed by NATO allies as a mixed bag, primarily due to its failure to commit to higher GDP spending targets. However, the plan signals critical strategic improvements by emphasizing novel technologies—such as autonomous systems and digital infrastructure—and enhancing readiness. Crucially, the DIP adopts an international focus through major collaborative programs (e.g., AUKUS, GCAP) and establishes a new National Armaments Director Group (NADG). This structural shift toward flexible, portfolio-based collaboration is strategically valuable for NATO allies seeking reliable partners as US conventional forces reduce their European presence.
-
3.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
4.
The roundtable established that implementing generational bans represents a powerful, long-term strategy for tackling deeply entrenched public health crises like tobacco use. Using the UK’s permanent ban on selling cigarettes to those born after 2009 as key evidence, experts analyzed how such policies fundamentally alter market dynamics and consumer behavior over time. These lessons suggest that other nations facing persistent addiction challenges should consider adopting similar age-gating or generational restrictions to accelerate decline and set a precedent for future public health policy interventions.
-
5.
The CSIS analysis finds that the U.S. grid's regulatory framework for connecting large loads is severely fragmented and unprepared for the massive electricity demands posed by AI data centers. FERC has mandated significant reforms across six regional operators, requiring them to modernize interconnection studies, prevent cost-shifting, and establish clear tariffs for co-located generation. Evidence shows that most operators fall far short of these new standards, necessitating complex, multi-year policy adjustments rather than simple compliance. Policymakers must coordinate federal regulation (FERC) with state utilities to accelerate grid modernization, ensuring energy affordability while maintaining technological competitiveness.