The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
Members' question time: What next for Hungary?
English Summary
Chatham House frames Hungary’s 12 April 2026 election as a pivotal contest for both Hungary and the EU, with the potential to alter Europe’s political trajectory. The core argument is that Viktor Orbán’s long rule—marked by hardline migration policy, weakened judicial independence, and closer ties with Russia—has created sustained conflict with Brussels and concerns about democratic backsliding. The event highlights Péter Magyar and the TISZA movement as Orbán’s strongest challenger in years, citing polling that suggests a plausible upset and a pro-EU, centrist alternative. Strategically, the outcome could either reinforce Hungary’s current sovereigntist path or trigger a policy reset toward EU alignment, with spillover effects on the momentum of right-leaning populist forces across Europe.
中文摘要
查塔姆研究所將匈牙利2026年4月12日選舉定位為對匈牙利與歐盟皆具關鍵意義的對決，可能改變歐洲政治走向。其核心論點指出，維克多・奧班（Viktor Orbán）長期執政期間所推動的強硬移民政策、司法獨立性削弱，以及與俄羅斯更緊密的關係，已造成與布魯塞爾的持續衝突，並引發民主倒退疑慮。該活動並強調彼得・馬扎爾（Péter Magyar）及TISZA運動是奧班多年來最具實力的挑戰者，援引民調顯示存在爆冷可能，且其提供親歐盟、中間路線的替代方案。從戰略層面看，選舉結果可能鞏固匈牙利當前的主權優先路線，或觸發朝向與歐盟一致的政策重置，並對歐洲各地右傾民粹勢力的動能產生外溢效應。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
3.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.
-
4.
The article analyzes the deep ideological split within the Democratic Party regarding the future of U.S. foreign policy, pitting centrists against progressives. Centrists generally advocate for restoring a reformed U.S.-led international order and strengthening alliances, while progressives argue for a multipolar world that prioritizes transnational threats like climate change and AI over geopolitical competition. This division is most pronounced in the Middle East, where centrists push for greater pressure on Israel and a regional settlement, a shift largely welcomed by progressives. The core finding is that these internal debates threaten to consume a future administration with indecision, making it difficult for the U.S. to project a coherent and unified global strategy.
-
5.
The Brookings report argues that the U.S.'s historical 'exorbitant privilege'—its ability to issue debt cheaply—is steadily eroding. Key evidence shows a decline in the U.S. convenience yield relative to G10 peers, a trend linked to rising domestic debt and global fiscal stress. While recent global interest rate hikes have temporarily improved the U.S.'s relative borrowing appeal, the underlying loss of cheap credit suggests potential future higher borrowing costs for the government and poses long-term risks to the dollar's status as a reserve currency.