The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Why are Middle Eastern governments lobbying against a US attack on Iran?
English Summary
Chatham House argues that many Middle Eastern governments now oppose a US strike on Iran because their threat perception has shifted from fear of Iranian regional dominance to concern about Israeli escalation and the consequences of an Iranian state collapse. It points to the weakening of Iran’s “Axis of Resistance” after 7 October 2023, Israeli military pressure across the region, Assad’s fall, and heightened Gulf alarm after Israel’s September 2025 strike on Doha as evidence of this shift. The analysis says regime-change war and broad containment are viewed by Arab states as dangerous and historically ineffective, with high risks of fragmentation, migration, militancy, and regional spillover. The policy implication is to favor de-escalation and targeted, policy-based pressure on Iran’s nuclear, missile, and proxy activities through diplomacy rather than large-scale military action.
中文摘要
查塔姆研究所指出，許多中東政府如今反對美國對伊朗發動打擊，原因在於其威脅認知已從擔憂伊朗在區域內的主導地位，轉向憂慮以色列升級行動及伊朗國家崩潰的後果。該文以2023年10月7日後伊朗「抵抗軸心」的削弱、以色列在區域各地的軍事施壓、阿薩德政權垮台，以及以色列於2025年9月襲擊杜哈後波灣國家的警戒升高，作為此一轉變的證據。分析認為，阿拉伯國家將政權更替戰爭與廣泛遏制視為危險且在歷史上成效不彰，並伴隨高度的碎片化、移民、激進武裝與區域外溢風險。其政策意涵是，應透過外交手段，對伊朗核計畫、飛彈與代理人活動施加有針對性、以政策為基礎的壓力，優先採取降級而非大規模軍事行動。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The article analyzes the deep ideological split within the Democratic Party regarding the future of U.S. foreign policy, pitting centrists against progressives. Centrists generally advocate for restoring a reformed U.S.-led international order and strengthening alliances, while progressives argue for a multipolar world that prioritizes transnational threats like climate change and AI over geopolitical competition. This division is most pronounced in the Middle East, where centrists push for greater pressure on Israel and a regional settlement, a shift largely welcomed by progressives. The core finding is that these internal debates threaten to consume a future administration with indecision, making it difficult for the U.S. to project a coherent and unified global strategy.
-
5.
The Pacific region is identified as the top priority for U.S. military deterrence due to intensifying strategic competition with China and the critical nature of regional trade routes. Maintaining stability, particularly across the Taiwan Strait, and upholding alliance commitments are central to preventing conflict. Strategically, the U.S. must invest heavily in joint warfighting capabilities, technological innovation, and operationalizing asymmetric defense measures to improve regional readiness.