The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Saudi–UAE tensions: Yemen and regional implications
English Summary
The Chatham House event argues that late-2025 Saudi-UAE friction over Yemen reflects a deeper strategic split, not just a tactical disagreement in one conflict. The core evidence is their opposing local alignments: the UAE’s backing of the Southern Transitional Council and southern autonomy versus Saudi support for Yemen’s internationally recognized government and territorial unity. Saudi efforts to freeze front lines and push a political settlement, alongside the UAE’s announced full withdrawal, exposed incompatible views of Yemen’s future security and governance architecture. Strategically, this suggests Gulf coordination will be less automatic, and policymakers should treat Yemen as a test case for wider Riyadh-Abu Dhabi divergence in regional influence, security priorities, and economic statecraft.
中文摘要
查塔姆研究所（Chatham House）的一場活動指出，2025年末沙烏地阿拉伯與阿拉伯聯合大公國在葉門問題上的摩擦，反映的是更深層的戰略分歧，而不僅是單一衝突中的戰術歧見。核心證據在於雙方相對立的在地結盟：阿聯酋支持南方過渡委員會與南部自治，沙烏地則支持葉門獲國際承認的政府與領土統一。沙烏地試圖凍結前線並推動政治解決方案，加上阿聯酋宣布全面撤軍，進一步暴露雙方對葉門未來安全與治理架構的看法互不相容。從戰略層面看，這意味著海灣國家之間的協調將不再是自動形成；政策制定者應將葉門視為檢驗利雅德—阿布達比在區域影響力、安全優先序與經濟治國手段上更廣泛分歧的試金石。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The article analyzes the deep ideological split within the Democratic Party regarding the future of U.S. foreign policy, pitting centrists against progressives. Centrists generally advocate for restoring a reformed U.S.-led international order and strengthening alliances, while progressives argue for a multipolar world that prioritizes transnational threats like climate change and AI over geopolitical competition. This division is most pronounced in the Middle East, where centrists push for greater pressure on Israel and a regional settlement, a shift largely welcomed by progressives. The core finding is that these internal debates threaten to consume a future administration with indecision, making it difficult for the U.S. to project a coherent and unified global strategy.
-
5.
The article highlights the critical importance of robust, timely early warning systems for civilian safety amid escalating conflict risks in the Gulf and Levant. While regional governments (e.g., Iran, UAE, Qatar) are investing in advanced mobile alert systems following recent escalations, the failure of such systems, as seen in Saudi Arabia, raises serious concerns. The evidence shows that effective warning mechanisms are becoming crucial for minimizing civilian casualties and injuries during attacks. Policymakers must prioritize the development and implementation of unified, community-based warning infrastructure to enhance resilience and preparedness across the region.