The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
Ethiopia needs more than an election to calm internal and regional conflict
English Summary
The Chatham House analysis argues that Ethiopia's deep-seated internal and regional conflicts—particularly in Tigray and Amhara—are overshadowing the upcoming election, rendering the poll insufficient for achieving stability. Escalating tensions are driven by the TPLF's reconstitution of regional authority and the risk of wider regional conflagration, evidenced by proxy conflicts and shifting alliances with neighbors like Eritrea and Sudan. Consequently, the report stresses that resolving the crisis requires an urgent, coordinated diplomatic response from major international actors (including the US, EU, and China) to bolster regional mediation efforts, rather than relying on political processes or electoral outcomes.
中文摘要
查塔姆學會的分析指出，衣索比亞根深蒂固的內部與區域衝突——特別是在提格雷和阿姆哈拉地區——正在掩蓋即將到來的選舉，使得透過民調無法實現穩定。緊張局勢的升級源於人民解放戰線黨（TPLF）重建區域權威，以及爆發更廣泛區域戰火的風險，這從與厄立特里亞和蘇丹等鄰國的代理人衝突和聯盟轉變中可見。因此，報告強調，解決這場危機需要主要國際行為者（包括美國、歐盟和中國）緊急且協調的外交回應，以加強區域調解努力，而非依賴政治過程或選舉結果。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Chatham House analysis concludes that the UK's Defence Investment Plan (DIP) will be viewed by NATO allies as a mixed bag, primarily due to its failure to commit to higher GDP spending targets. However, the plan signals critical strategic improvements by emphasizing novel technologies—such as autonomous systems and digital infrastructure—and enhancing readiness. Crucially, the DIP adopts an international focus through major collaborative programs (e.g., AUKUS, GCAP) and establishes a new National Armaments Director Group (NADG). This structural shift toward flexible, portfolio-based collaboration is strategically valuable for NATO allies seeking reliable partners as US conventional forces reduce their European presence.
-
3.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
4.
The article argues that while Ukraine's deep strikes and Russia's mounting economic instability create a window for peace talks, President Putin remains committed to maximalist demands and may escalate conflict through increased air assaults. Key evidence supporting this tension includes the strain on Russian energy infrastructure versus Moscow's refusal to negotiate in good faith, preferring instead to expand its claims. Consequently, the immediate strategic implication is that Washington must lead intensive diplomacy—a 'shuttle diplomacy'—to establish a framework agreement centered on a ceasefire along current lines and defining long-term European security arrangements.
-
5.
Myanmar has collapsed into Asia’s deadliest conflict, marked by massive economic collapse, widespread famine, and extreme brutality from the military junta. Despite this catastrophic humanitarian crisis, international actors—including major powers and regional blocs like ASEAN—are largely ignoring or withdrawing support for democratic forces. This neglect allows the junta to consolidate power, receiving critical military aid from authoritarian allies such as Russia and Belarus. Policy implications suggest that global indifference is enabling a failed state environment, making Myanmar a highly volatile flashpoint whose instability threatens broader Indo-Pacific security.