The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
A 2026 ‘super El Niño’ could expose gaps in UK preparedness
English Summary
The Chatham House report warns that intensified climate variability, exemplified by a potential 2026 'super El Niño,' will expose critical gaps in the UK's national resilience. Current adaptation efforts are deemed fragmented and lack legally binding standards, leaving essential infrastructure—including health, transport, and power grids—vulnerable to escalating risks like heat, flooding, and drought. To mitigate potential climate damages estimated at 1-5% of UK GDP by 2050, the UK must implement a robust, legally enforceable adaptation strategy. Policy recommendations include mandatory, coordinated investment in resilient physical and social infrastructure, improving existing plans, and securing dedicated funding for local authorities.
中文摘要
查塔姆館（Chatham House）的報告警告，氣候變異性的加劇，例如潛在的2026年「超級厄爾尼諾現象」，將會暴露出英國國家韌性方面的關鍵缺口。現行的適應措施被認為是零散且缺乏具法律約束力的標準，使得包括醫療、交通和電力電網在內的關鍵基礎設施，容易受到熱浪、洪水和乾旱等升級風險的威脅。為減緩預計到2050年造成佔英國國內生產總值（GDP）1-5%的氣候損害，英國必須實施一套穩健且具法律強制力的適應戰略。政策建議包括：強制性地協調投資於具韌性的實體和社會基礎設施、改善現有計畫，並為地方政府確保專項資金。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.