ThinkTankWeekly

Syria and the Levant

Chatham House | 2026-02-22 | diplomacy

Topics: Middle East, Russia

Visit original source

ThinkTankWeekly provides a curated entry and summary only. Full text and PDF remain on the publisher's website.

English Summary

Chatham House argues that Assad’s abrupt fall in December 2024 revealed Syria’s state fragility, the limited capacity of Iran and Russia to sustain him, and the strategic failure of past Western policy. It reasons that Syria’s transition will be shaped by neighboring states—especially Turkey, Jordan, Israel, and Lebanon—which see both security risks and geopolitical openings as a new government seeks reconstruction support. The analysis highlights Lebanon’s governance stress from Hezbollah’s weakening after conflict with Israel, and Jordan’s added vulnerability as U.S. policy under President Donald Trump may intensify West Bank dynamics. Policy strategy should therefore prioritize a genuinely Syrian-led political transition, disciplined regional burden-sharing, and early safeguards against spillover instability in Lebanon and Jordan while avoiding prior external policy mistakes.

中文摘要

研究所指出,阿塞德政權於2024年12月的突然垮台,暴露出敘利亞國家體制的脆弱性、伊朗與俄羅斯維持其統治能力的有限性,以及過去西方政策的戰略失敗。該文認為,敘利亞的轉型將由周邊國家塑造,尤其是土耳其、約旦、以色列與黎巴嫩;在新政府尋求重建支持之際,這些國家同時看到安全風險與地緣政治機會。分析強調,黎巴嫩在真主黨與以色列衝突後勢力走弱,致使其治理壓力加劇;同時,隨著美國總統唐納·川普政府的政策可能加劇西岸局勢,約旦的脆弱性也進一步上升。因此,政策策略應優先推動真正由敘利亞主導的政治轉型、推進有紀律的區域責任分擔,並及早建立防範機制,以遏止不穩定外溢至黎巴嫩與約旦,同時避免重蹈過去外部政策的覆轍。

Related Entries

  1. 1.

    The rapid financing of the AI boom through massive corporate debt issuance is creating significant stress on global financial markets. This influx of private capital forces competition with government Treasury bonds, as AI companies offer higher yields than equivalent sovereign debt, thereby pushing up long-term interest rates. While this signals strong investment demand for AI, it raises concerns about systemic risk and the potential destabilization of core bond markets. Policymakers must navigate the tension between fueling critical technological growth and maintaining stable public borrowing costs to prevent a financial crisis.

    Read at CFR

  2. 2.
    2026-09-02 | europe | 2026-W36 | Topics: Climate, Europe, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Ukraine

    The Chatham House report argues that climate change represents Europe's greatest systemic security threat, citing recent extreme heatwaves, droughts, and wildfires that have caused massive economic losses, infrastructure failures, and excess deaths. These environmental shocks disrupt critical services (like energy supply) and increase vulnerability to non-conventional threats, forcing military resources to divert personnel away from traditional defense roles. To counter this, the report mandates a comprehensive security approach: treating climate adaptation as core national security spending, accelerating decarbonization to address root causes, and building robust societal resilience through coordinated civil preparedness.

    Read at Chatham House

  3. 3.
    2026-09-02 | africa | 2026-W36 | Topics: Europe

    The Chatham House analysis argues that for Zambia to sustain its economic reforms and attract vital foreign investment, President Hichilema must prioritize preserving democratic institutions during the upcoming election. While macroeconomic stabilization has restored international confidence, political legitimacy hinges on a credible electoral process, as voters are yet to feel the benefits of abstract financial rehabilitation. Consequently, international allies are advised to act as 'critical friends,' ensuring that their support for economic stability is consistently coupled with demands for institutional integrity and democratic restraint. This balanced approach is vital to prevent authoritarian drift from undermining Zambia's foundational political capital.

    Read at Chatham House

  4. 4.
    2026-09-02 | middle_east | 2026-W36 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    Six months after the U.S.-Israel attack on Iran, experts conclude that Washington has suffered a strategic defeat due to underestimating Iran's resilience and capacity for resistance. The conflict has significantly heightened regional instability, fueling sophisticated online propaganda from Tehran that creates a dangerous content advantage for radicalization efforts against U.S. interests. Furthermore, the war is paradoxically benefiting Turkey, which is consolidating its power through new regional security agreements, thus reducing overall U.S. influence in the Middle East. Policymakers must urgently counter Iran's ideological warfare and prepare for a shifting balance of power that diminishes American hegemony.

    Read at CFR

  5. 5.
    2026-09-02 | middle_east | 2026-W36 | Topics: Middle East, Trade

    Iraq faces an existential test of state sovereignty and reform as it navigates intense regional instability. Key pressures include armed attacks from Iran-aligned groups, renewed questions about the state's monopoly on force due to external strikes, and severe economic strain stemming from oil market disruptions. The core challenge is managing escalating geopolitical competition between Washington and Tehran while simultaneously advancing institutional reforms necessary for economic diversification. International support must therefore focus not only on security stabilization but also on supporting Baghdad’s efforts to build a resilient, independent course away from volatile energy dependence.

    Read at Chatham House