The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
Lessons From 250 Years of U.S. Foreign Policy, With Robert Kagan
English Summary
Robert Kagan argues that U.S. foreign policy is frequently misunderstood as isolationist when it is historically defined by constant global engagement. He refutes the myth of American neutrality, asserting that history shows continuous expansion and interaction with great powers, driven not by external threats but by internal forces. These persistent outward pulls include economic necessity (as a trading nation), universalist ideological values, and the natural consequence of accumulating power. The key implication for policy is that strategic planning must recognize this deeply ingrained pattern of global involvement—rather than viewing it as an occasional deviation from domestic isolationism—to accurately predict future American actions.
中文摘要
羅伯特·卡根論述，美國的外交政策經常被誤解為孤立主義，但其歷史定義卻是持續的全球參與。他反駁了「美國中立」的神話，指出歷史證明美國與大國之間存在著持續的擴張和互動，而這些驅動力並非來自外部威脅，而是源於內在力量。這些持久的外向拉力包括經濟需求（作為一個貿易國家）、普遍主義的意識形態價值觀，以及累積權力的自然結果。對政策而言，關鍵的啟示是：戰略規劃必須認識到這種根深蒂固的全球介入模式——而非將其視為偶爾偏離國內孤立主義的例外情況——才能準確預測美國未來的行動。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Chatham House analysis concludes that the UK's Defence Investment Plan (DIP) will be viewed by NATO allies as a mixed bag, primarily due to its failure to commit to higher GDP spending targets. However, the plan signals critical strategic improvements by emphasizing novel technologies—such as autonomous systems and digital infrastructure—and enhancing readiness. Crucially, the DIP adopts an international focus through major collaborative programs (e.g., AUKUS, GCAP) and establishes a new National Armaments Director Group (NADG). This structural shift toward flexible, portfolio-based collaboration is strategically valuable for NATO allies seeking reliable partners as US conventional forces reduce their European presence.
-
3.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
4.
The roundtable established that implementing generational bans represents a powerful, long-term strategy for tackling deeply entrenched public health crises like tobacco use. Using the UK’s permanent ban on selling cigarettes to those born after 2009 as key evidence, experts analyzed how such policies fundamentally alter market dynamics and consumer behavior over time. These lessons suggest that other nations facing persistent addiction challenges should consider adopting similar age-gating or generational restrictions to accelerate decline and set a precedent for future public health policy interventions.
-
5.
The CSIS analysis finds that the U.S. grid's regulatory framework for connecting large loads is severely fragmented and unprepared for the massive electricity demands posed by AI data centers. FERC has mandated significant reforms across six regional operators, requiring them to modernize interconnection studies, prevent cost-shifting, and establish clear tariffs for co-located generation. Evidence shows that most operators fall far short of these new standards, necessitating complex, multi-year policy adjustments rather than simple compliance. Policymakers must coordinate federal regulation (FERC) with state utilities to accelerate grid modernization, ensuring energy affordability while maintaining technological competitiveness.