The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
Time to Stop Forecasting China’s Surplus Away
English Summary
This CFR analysis argues against forecasting China’s external surplus to decline, citing a persistent trend toward a 10% of GDP surplus driven by China’s high savings rate (over 40%). Evidence includes the IMF’s consistent underestimation of the surplus, exacerbated by China’s property bubble burst and a depreciating exchange rate. The article highlights a systemic bias within the IMF towards deemphasizing imbalances, and points to the outlier nature of China’s savings rate compared to economies with similar rates. Consequently, policy should shift away from advocating for a reduction in China’s surplus and instead acknowledge China’s evolving comparative advantage, particularly in industrial policy.
中文摘要
本CFR分析認為不應預測中國的外部貿易盈餘將下降，理由是中國持續呈現10%的國內生產總值（GDP）盈餘的趨勢，這主要源於中國的儲蓄率高達40%以上。 證據包括國際貨幣基金會（IMF）對盈餘持續低估，並受到中國房地產泡沫爆發和匯率貶值的加劇。 該文章強調了IMF內部存在的一種系統性偏見，即對淡化不平衡現象的傾向，並指出中國儲蓄率在類似儲蓄率的經濟體中是極端情況。 因此，政策應從推動減少中國盈餘轉向，並承認中國不斷演變的比較優勢，尤其是在工業政策方面。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
3.
The roundtable established that implementing generational bans represents a powerful, long-term strategy for tackling deeply entrenched public health crises like tobacco use. Using the UK’s permanent ban on selling cigarettes to those born after 2009 as key evidence, experts analyzed how such policies fundamentally alter market dynamics and consumer behavior over time. These lessons suggest that other nations facing persistent addiction challenges should consider adopting similar age-gating or generational restrictions to accelerate decline and set a precedent for future public health policy interventions.
-
4.
The article argues that while Ukraine's deep strikes and Russia's mounting economic instability create a window for peace talks, President Putin remains committed to maximalist demands and may escalate conflict through increased air assaults. Key evidence supporting this tension includes the strain on Russian energy infrastructure versus Moscow's refusal to negotiate in good faith, preferring instead to expand its claims. Consequently, the immediate strategic implication is that Washington must lead intensive diplomacy—a 'shuttle diplomacy'—to establish a framework agreement centered on a ceasefire along current lines and defining long-term European security arrangements.
-
5.
Myanmar has collapsed into Asia’s deadliest conflict, marked by massive economic collapse, widespread famine, and extreme brutality from the military junta. Despite this catastrophic humanitarian crisis, international actors—including major powers and regional blocs like ASEAN—are largely ignoring or withdrawing support for democratic forces. This neglect allows the junta to consolidate power, receiving critical military aid from authoritarian allies such as Russia and Belarus. Policy implications suggest that global indifference is enabling a failed state environment, making Myanmar a highly volatile flashpoint whose instability threatens broader Indo-Pacific security.