The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
How Aid to Gaza Compares Across Arab Countries
English Summary
The CFR report examines the fluctuating aid flow to Gaza from Arab countries following the 2023 Israel-Hamas conflict, revealing a complex interplay of geopolitical interests and humanitarian concerns. Initially, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE provided significant aid, with Egypt and Jordan utilizing land and air corridors, while Saudi Arabia and the UAE relied on airdrops. However, a 37% decline in aid deliveries in early 2026, coinciding with the outbreak of the U.S.-Iran conflict and Israel’s subsequent closure of aid routes, significantly worsened the humanitarian crisis. This drop was exacerbated by Israel’s restrictions on international aid organizations operating in Gaza. The situation underscores the challenges of delivering aid to a conflict zone and the impact of regional conflicts on humanitarian efforts, highlighting the need for robust diplomatic solutions and secure access corridors.
中文摘要
本報告由戰略與國際研究中心（CFR）分析了2023年以色列與哈瑪斯衝突後，阿拉伯國家對加薩的援助流量波動情況，揭示了地緣政治利益與人道主義關切之間複雜的相互作用。最初，埃及、約旦、沙烏地阿拉伯和阿聯酋提供了顯著的援助，其中埃及和約旦利用陸空通道，而沙烏地阿拉伯和阿聯酋則主要依靠空投。然而，2026年初援助交付量下降了37%，與美國與伊朗之間的衝突爆發以及以色列隨後關閉援助路線的同時發生，顯著加劇了人道危機。這一下降並受到以色列對在加薩運營國際援助組織的限制所加劇。情況表明，向衝突地區提供援助的挑戰以及地區衝突對人道主義努力的影響，強調了需要堅實的雙邊外交解決方案和安全的通道。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.