The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.
Preparing for the Day After in Europe
English Summary
CFR analysts argue that Western policymakers must immediately begin planning for a post-settlement Europe, as a ceasefire in Ukraine will not eliminate Russia's long-term security threat but rather shift it toward hybrid warfare and military testing of NATO cohesion. Potential risks include deepening transatlantic friction over sanctions relief and commercial normalization with Moscow, alongside intra-European disputes regarding defense burden-sharing. To mitigate these threats, the report recommends a G7-coordinated Russia strategy, a revitalized 'Harmel-style' NATO blueprint for dual-track deterrence, and the implementation of new Europe-wide risk reduction measures to stabilize the expanded NATO-Russia border.
中文摘要
CFR 分析師指出，西方決策者必須立即開始規劃協議達成後的歐洲，因為烏克蘭停火並不會消除俄羅斯的長期安全威脅，而是會將其轉向混合戰，並對北約的凝聚力進行軍事測試。潛在風險包括在解除制裁以及與莫斯科商業關係正常化問題上加深跨大西洋摩擦，以及歐洲內部關於國防負擔分擔的爭議。為了減輕這些威脅，報告建議制定一項由 G7 協調的對俄戰略、一份振興的「哈默爾式」北約雙軌威懾藍圖，並實施新的全歐洲風險降低措施，以穩定擴大後的北約與俄羅斯邊境。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Chatham House analysis concludes that the UK's Defence Investment Plan (DIP) will be viewed by NATO allies as a mixed bag, primarily due to its failure to commit to higher GDP spending targets. However, the plan signals critical strategic improvements by emphasizing novel technologies—such as autonomous systems and digital infrastructure—and enhancing readiness. Crucially, the DIP adopts an international focus through major collaborative programs (e.g., AUKUS, GCAP) and establishes a new National Armaments Director Group (NADG). This structural shift toward flexible, portfolio-based collaboration is strategically valuable for NATO allies seeking reliable partners as US conventional forces reduce their European presence.
-
3.
The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.
-
4.
The roundtable established that implementing generational bans represents a powerful, long-term strategy for tackling deeply entrenched public health crises like tobacco use. Using the UK’s permanent ban on selling cigarettes to those born after 2009 as key evidence, experts analyzed how such policies fundamentally alter market dynamics and consumer behavior over time. These lessons suggest that other nations facing persistent addiction challenges should consider adopting similar age-gating or generational restrictions to accelerate decline and set a precedent for future public health policy interventions.
-
5.
The CSIS analysis finds that the U.S. grid's regulatory framework for connecting large loads is severely fragmented and unprepared for the massive electricity demands posed by AI data centers. FERC has mandated significant reforms across six regional operators, requiring them to modernize interconnection studies, prevent cost-shifting, and establish clear tariffs for co-located generation. Evidence shows that most operators fall far short of these new standards, necessitating complex, multi-year policy adjustments rather than simple compliance. Policymakers must coordinate federal regulation (FERC) with state utilities to accelerate grid modernization, ensuring energy affordability while maintaining technological competitiveness.