The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
The Revamped Food for Peace Program Bypasses Countries Closest to Famine
English Summary
The Food for Peace program, transferred from USAID to USDA following the 2025 DOGE dismantling, now prioritizes U.S. agricultural interests over humanitarian needs, bypassing countries facing famine including Sudan, Somalia, and South Sudan in favor of seven selected recipients. New procurement rules require 100-percent U.S. commodities and expensive U.S.-flag shipping, consuming resources needed for operational costs like inland transport and distribution. The underlying "trade over aid" agenda treats hunger assistance as a means to create markets for U.S. farmers through tariff reductions, repeating the failed Haiti model of deepening dependency rather than reducing it. Without expanding recipient countries, revising procurement rules, and returning coordination to the State Department, the program risks undermining both humanitarian outcomes and agricultural support goals.
中文摘要
「糧食和平計畫」（Food for Peace）自從2025年DOGE機構解體後，已從美國國際開發署（USAID）轉移至美國農業部（USDA）。該計畫現階段將美國農業利益置於人道需求之上，繞過了包括蘇丹、索馬利亞和南蘇丹在內、面臨飢荒的國家，轉而只惠及七個被選定的接收國。新的採購規定要求使用百分之百美國商品，並需支付昂貴的美國國旗運輸費用，這消耗了本應用於內陸運輸和分配等營運成本的資源。其潛在的「貿易優先於援助」議程，將糧食援助視為透過關稅減免為美國農民創造市場的手段，重蹈了海地模式的覆轍，加深了依賴性而非減少依賴性。若不擴大接收國家範圍、修訂採購規定，並將協調權交回國務院，該計畫就有可能同時損害人道成果和農業支持目標。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
5.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.