ThinkTankWeekly

Mexico’s Long War: Drugs, Crime, and the Cartels

CFR | 2026-02-26 | diplomacy

Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Trade, United States

Visit original source

ThinkTankWeekly provides a curated entry and summary only. Full text and PDF remain on the publisher's website.

English Summary

Mexico's two-decade struggle against drug cartels has resulted in escalating violence and instability, with over 463,000 homicides since 2006, despite billions in U.S. security assistance. Powerful cartels like Sinaloa and CJNG continue to dominate the illicit drug trade into the U.S., fueling rampant corruption and overwhelming militarized government responses that often lead to further cartel fragmentation. The recent killing of a major cartel leader, "El Mencho," further destabilized the region, highlighting the ineffectiveness of current strategies in curbing violence and drug demand. This persistent crisis underscores the urgent need for revised, more effective U.S.-Mexico security and counternarcotics policies that address the root causes of cartel power and violence.

中文摘要

墨西哥近二十年來與販毒集團的對抗,導致暴力衝突與局勢動盪日益加劇。儘管美國已提供數十億美元的安全援助,自 2006 年以來,相關謀殺案仍累計超過 46.3 萬起。錫納羅亞(Sinaloa)與哈利斯科新世代(CJNG)等勢力龐大的販毒集團,持續主導向美國輸送的非法毒品貿易,不僅助長了猖獗的腐敗,更使政府的軍事化應對措施疲於奔命,且往往導致集團進一步碎片化。近期主要首領「埃爾·門喬」(El Mencho)遭擊斃,進一步動搖了區域穩定,凸顯出當前策略在遏制暴力與毒品需求方面的成效不彰。此一持續性的危機,凸顯了美墨雙方迫切需要修訂更具成效的安全與禁毒政策,以從根源解決販毒集團的權力與暴力問題。

Related Entries

  1. 1.
    2026-07-13 | china_indopacific | 2026-W29 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The China-Russia partnership is a highly consequential geopolitical alignment driven by a shared goal of countering U.S. hegemony and reshaping the international order into a multipolar system. While not a formal alliance, this relationship is strengthened by Russia's increasing economic reliance on China following Western sanctions, which allows Beijing to leverage its influence. Policymakers should note that while the partnership projects deep solidarity (as seen in high-level summits), it remains complex and limited by mutual mistrust and competing strategic interests. This enduring alignment poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests and requires continued diplomatic vigilance.

    Read at Brookings

  2. 2.
    2026-07-13 | defense | 2026-W29 | Topics: Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia

    The Chatham House analysis concludes that the UK's Defence Investment Plan (DIP) will be viewed by NATO allies as a mixed bag, primarily due to its failure to commit to higher GDP spending targets. However, the plan signals critical strategic improvements by emphasizing novel technologies—such as autonomous systems and digital infrastructure—and enhancing readiness. Crucially, the DIP adopts an international focus through major collaborative programs (e.g., AUKUS, GCAP) and establishes a new National Armaments Director Group (NADG). This structural shift toward flexible, portfolio-based collaboration is strategically valuable for NATO allies seeking reliable partners as US conventional forces reduce their European presence.

    Read at Chatham House

  3. 3.
    2026-07-13 | defense | 2026-W29 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that the U.S., through recent policy signals—such as questioning NATO's value or sympathizing with great-power territorial claims—is inadvertently adopting the core tenets of non-alignment, prioritizing transactional national interests over binding alliances. Historically, while non-alignment allowed developing nations to gain benefits without commitment, the analysis notes that this approach lacks the deep trust and shared obligations necessary for robust security structures. The implication is critical: by undermining established alliances, the U.S. risks losing its greatest strategic asset—the network of mutual commitments—as allies actively seek alternative bilateral or regional defense pacts.

    Read at CFR

  4. 4.
    2026-07-13 | health | 2026-W29 | Topics: United States

    The roundtable established that implementing generational bans represents a powerful, long-term strategy for tackling deeply entrenched public health crises like tobacco use. Using the UK’s permanent ban on selling cigarettes to those born after 2009 as key evidence, experts analyzed how such policies fundamentally alter market dynamics and consumer behavior over time. These lessons suggest that other nations facing persistent addiction challenges should consider adopting similar age-gating or generational restrictions to accelerate decline and set a precedent for future public health policy interventions.

    Read at CFR

  5. 5.
    2026-07-13 | energy | 2026-W29 | Topics: Climate, Trade, United States

    The CSIS analysis finds that the U.S. grid's regulatory framework for connecting large loads is severely fragmented and unprepared for the massive electricity demands posed by AI data centers. FERC has mandated significant reforms across six regional operators, requiring them to modernize interconnection studies, prevent cost-shifting, and establish clear tariffs for co-located generation. Evidence shows that most operators fall far short of these new standards, necessitating complex, multi-year policy adjustments rather than simple compliance. Policymakers must coordinate federal regulation (FERC) with state utilities to accelerate grid modernization, ensuring energy affordability while maintaining technological competitiveness.

    Read at CSIS